DaveJonGilmour

I mean, THE PIXIES HAVE MADE AN ALBUM that's named after this site???

Now that I’ve read your personal profile, I like you even more! What a thrill!

and then "they gave the Mona Lisa a mustache," what a stupid thing to say!

And now I’ve also understood how much you’re worth, Sanjuro: on 03/10/2006 you published a rather devoted review of Nevermind by Nirvana and among other things, you said: "Nevermind is the most important CD of the 90s." And then in a post: "Nirvana are one of the greatest bands in history, they leave all their contemporary peers in the dust for intensity and compositional intelligence. YES, COMPOSITIONAL INTELLIGENCE."
Then after eight months, you totally changed your mind: on 11/06/2006 in your review of Bleach by Nirvana from thetrooper, you said, "ENOUGH MY GOD WITH NIRVANA! Always the same structures, always the same scheme towards melodic chorus hard or vice versa. Nirvana, as commendable as they are, are light-years behind so many... an important band because they brought the underground to the forefront and made many familiar with the alternative underground of the 80s and 90s, but beyond this, they remain albums to which one can give a 7/10 and nothing more." But how? A 7/10 for the most important CD of the 90s? Well, this gives me hope that sooner or later you might publish a review of "The Wall," describing each track as a masterpiece and praising Waters, Gilmour, and the others for having introduced you to true music.

Who would have dared to cover Hendrix?????!!!!!!!

That is to say, all of this to point out that Waters' intentions could only be forcibly associated with punk or new wave, due to an incorrect generalization in and of those years.

Needless to say, I invite Poletti once again to respond if he disagrees with what I wrote in the nice post above, but I think he will do as usual and have no replies.

I am still waiting for Sanjuro's response... and yet my question is neither ironic nor abstract, I do not understand what he is waiting for to reply to me. If he is so convinced of what he says, he must have his good reasons... next time, he should tell us in advance, in order to avoid pointless reasoning and mere assertions of well-known truths. Thank you also to everyone else.

Thank you Sanjuro, you had to tell us that kraut has more imagination and visceral quality than Dream Theater. Can you respond to me now? What's wrong with this live? By the way, since you still haven't given a rating, have you seen it? What do you think, staying chronologically within those three days during which it was filmed?

I don’t think one can say "he was clearly inspired" if we’re talking about abstract arguments like paranoia, a sharp soul, inner roughness, torment... in short, we’re not discussing music that can be compared in one way or another; we are analyzing the inner angers of certain people, in similar contexts but with very different intentions... there were the Reeds, the Morrisons, the Lennons, and no one has ever grouped them under the same roof... now the punk or new wave wave comes along and you want to include them with a Waters who has been around long before? It all seems impossible to me; I mean, how could Waters care about these new changes happening when he himself was a protagonist of great changes years earlier? It’s certainly not in the intentions of an artist like Waters to cast glances of regard at totally opposing and discordant musical contexts, nor at still embryonic socio-cultural contexts; he would have only wasted his time. It was easier for him to dig into his own self and erect The Wall.