DaveJonGilmour

But I didn't take offense because you told me to be quiet. When I said that I would be silent, it's because I have too many unfinished conversations that I would like to pick up on, and they stimulate me much more than the discussion about light music interpreters. I merely stated that many artists in this field would deserve more appreciation than Celentano, but if you don't consider the artists I mentioned as interpreters or as "inferior" to Celentano, then I don't want to talk about it too much; I prefer to spend my time on other things, that's all. If I offended you by saying "ripigliate," I was referring to the fact that, according to you, Celentano has been a fixed point for 50 years, which is more than debatable (even if I don't want to argue about it) for various reasons, first of all because he has changed countless genres, he has had many faces, and he often falls into the banal or pretentious; in short, he often demands to be someone significant, and I really don't like that (and I believe many others don't either). I wouldn't want to go into too much detail since this isn't my preferred musical field; I just expressed my opinion after reflecting on it. Cammariere and Morgan are simply the first two that came to mind, and of course, I only considered Cammariere's role as an interpreter, regardless of the fact that he is a singer-songwriter. I have nothing more to say about it because I wouldn't know what else to say.

I repeat: he touched her in that way, he didn't just make criticisms, he was cruel towards them. I could say that the heart doesn't command, but that would just make you feel sorry for me, right?

Alright, even though you don't want to tell me if saputello is your favorite reviewer, I would even accept the idiot. But regarding Mariaelena, I didn't respond out of my ass. I already told you that you don't know the reason for my response: Mariaelena has, on several occasions, wanted to make me understand that since she is older, she knows more about music than I do, and this was just another opportunity to reiterate that this is absolutely not the case, meaning that it can't even be a common belief that those who are older are more knowledgeable. If you're interested, I refer you to the review of La crus, I think, but it has happened on other occasions as well.

@Festwca: did they help this rapper with sound research or what?

Alright, man, we won’t go to jail for this. I wrote those things about the reviewer (who, by the way, got me annoyed just with that review) because I felt touched since he had "dared" too much against my favorite band. You called me a retard jerk because I offended your favorite reviewer?

And then what does your sentence mean? So all the groups with influences from Queen should be called the poor man's Queen, don't you think? Porcupine Tree are the poor man's Pink Floyd. Led Zeppelin are the poor man's Yardbirds. Alan Sorrenti is the poor man's Tim Buckley. Should we think like this about everyone, since everyone has their influences?

What skill do you mean? If you mean technique alone, Mercury is 1000 and LaBrie is zero, but there’s really no comparison among other musicians. I repeat, what is the essence of your argument?

And what would you like to say? That they are qualitatively better than Can(!) and Soft Machine(!)? Or explain yourself better.

I mean??? Their albums cost less????

Really?? I thought it was "skifo," but I just checked on Treccani, and indeed it’s "schifo." And then a fan can't be objective in evaluating music; that is, they will never give their favorite band a debaserian 1, but they can definitely be objective in their reviews.