DaveJonGilmour

So many clichés and useless vulgarities. Definitely a shitty disc. Idiotic cover.

But is Poletti an idiot? Or am I the idiot for asking myself this for the umpteenth time??? Just look at so many things: THE SQUALID SARCASM (Let there be light)-THE ARROGANT SHOW-OFF (this album)-THE CHARACTERISTIC IGNORANCE (does it really exist)-THE GRATIS INSULT (a nonsense from the reviewer)-THE OMNIPRESENT IDIOCY (Marco Poletti Dixit)-THE SUPERB CRAP (Long live it)... ARE YOU EVEN AWARE THAT THERE IS NOT EVEN ONE GRAMMATICAL ERROR??? LEGENDARY!

Really nice.. good ol' Rick never lets us down, dear!

I greet the Watersians

Um...scusa

AAAAAAAAAAA the first review I see where Polletti responds to the rightful offenses. Come on Polle, I prefer you like this, fiery, let’s go you can do it!!!

The fool of Polletti goes to check out the favorite discs of Bertoncelli and adds them to his list uhhauuhauha.

ooops

I absolutely think like a philosopher.

@Jim Morrison: and here we are, Jim. So: I said that the banality is greater in TFC compared to Wywh precisely because in TFC there are those 4 tracks I mentioned that have a musical section (the entire musical section, not just a simple passage) which, in my opinion, is banal and not varied at all. What else should I explain to you? Then you say: >>>Oh, what did the Floyd do on this album besides playing in the studio?<<< Are you referring to WYWH? And what should they have done? What they did with TFC, but with more ideas and roughly the same amount of time available, and even if, as you say, TFC is >>>born and developed over time<<< it wouldn't mean anything, precisely because the quality of ideas does not depend on the time taken to realize them, that's it. If you have been studying music for years and know it very well, and in your opinion those tracks are not obvious, perhaps you are right (this is said by someone who studies music only for passion and not for long), but you should show me that, because I still don't get there.