Cornell

Okay, I set too many limits for myself and I can't even ski, damn it.. And Deep Purple are a mediocre band. And Pearl Jam too. And that's it.

Mmm.. Why just one? If we look at antiquity, there was a god for everything.. It would be, in the absurd, more believable.. There is no god, no entity, it’s just a matter of incredibly fortunate coincidences, implausible if you think about it, but they are still coincidences if we are here. No one can explain why, at a certain point, from radiation, a gigatomic explosion occurred and all of this was born. Many have tried, one of these explanations is called God, in whatever form you take it. So there exists an entity that, having nothing to do and being bored to death because it was all dark, started mixing air, fire, earth, and water, atoms, protons, electrons, and neutrons, matter and antimatter, and gave life to all this just to tell us "Now it’s your mess?"

@JURIX: I fully agree with every syllable of your comment (33).

@ROCCIA&Affini: Yes, but... Believer in what?

The hairless pecs are definitely his, since the little prick made some dough singing about the brothers from the outskirts of Milan. During the day he mostly has nothing to do and regularly hits the gym. Worse than him is the latest nonsense from our national Vasco. If I were Thom Yorke, I’d make a point to slap two dry pizzas on his face and give him a kick in the ass with my toes. I would have given it a 5 (ironically) if I had said it was a masterpiece, but it’s too easy to shoot at the Red Cross.

Mmmm... So, the review is well done.. I've only listened to 4 or 5 tracks from the album, I don't feel like rating it, even though at first glance it doesn't seem bad. I'll revisit it.

"Can someone give me a summary? (I was stuck at Master of Puppets, which sounds more dated than Venom). Anyway, I would like to know how Pearl Jam with Ten can be linked to the trend of Nevermind when Ten was released on August 27, 1991, while Nevermind came out on September 24, 1991." PIXIES, you got me ahead.. FRANCI, aside from the fact that Pearl Jam has nothing to do with Cobain and the gang, if you didn't "live" those years when it was happening, now you can only say you like the music they make or you don't like it. The Seattle movement went beyond music; it was an atmosphere of freshness, there was no competition over who sold more or who played better, there was respect and brotherhood among the bands, a desire to play, more in small clubs than in huge stadiums, there was an air of novelty, the spirit was really different. The same goes for the '60s and '70s and beyond.. I didn't experience them firsthand, but it would be like saying: Deep Purple was a "mediocre" band (not in a negative sense, but because they never aspired to be anything more)."

You're welcome, no problem.. See, in the end, it turned out better? Bold, rebellious, just the right amount of cheeky, but not vulgar. It perfectly complements the album you wanted to describe. Well done. P.S.: Terry doesn't like to play with the dido'.. ;) If that fool of your boyfriend prefers Risiko and soccer, there are strapping young lads here who would gladly help you open the third drawer with you! ;P

Never been able to stand them, there was just no way.. And to think I grew up in the '80s.. Still, I can't really give a low rating to the PSB, who do I think I am? A band that has made history (as Pino Scotto says when he doesn't know what to say, which is almost always). Good review, Gus!

And the Doctor also thoroughly explained the "live" discussion.