Voto:
Other Misfits compared to the first ones, needless to say... anyway, a more than decent job, and Graves is not bad at all as a singer, setting aside pointless comparisons with Danzig. And the "thrash" vibe fits well as an evolution, a path already taken by others, which in my opinion hasn't always yielded bad results (Exploited). Anyway, I confirm, Doyle has always been there.
Voto:
Absolutely, one of my first serious video games... what enemies, what settings... the final level when you defeated the two bosses and the ceiling opened to reveal the sky... endless nostalgia. I would play it again right now if I had the chance, a combination of high-octane gameplay, beautifully rendered environments, perfect music, and an overall vibe that was truly awesome... I believe no one at the time could have been unimpressed by it. And in this, I see art, personally. From that period, I also remember Duke 3D, another truly amazing and engaging game, and another FPS that terrified me but I liked quite a bit: I believe it was the first Quake, it had hellish environments, to say the least. A few years later, I played the second Quake instead, wonderful and incredibly fun but definitely less sinister. I miss Heretic though, especially the one with the Egyptian setting (something I've always loved not just in video games). As for the video games-violence discussion, I'd rather keep quiet, I’ll just say that it always seemed like a bunch of nonsense to me.
Voto:
The review encouraged me to learn more about this author, but where has Dr. Misogino gone??
Voto:
Beautiful Parasite Eve 2, one of my all-time favorites. Underrated, yes.
Voto:
Maybe I'm not emo, but they definitely suck XD
Voto:
Compared to the first one, it was definitely a walk in the park... but the Mercenaries mode with Nikolai was the hardest thing in the world. Lord, I just say: long live B.A.D. :-) Anyway, the most destructive thing in the entire series was the modified Desert Eagle from 2; with that, you could take down anything...
Voto:
But does it have to do with the G-spot?
Voto:
PS Double votes don't count.
Voto:
No, I take issue because you're raising criticisms that don't exist... it seems to me that I've argued quite well anyway. The only thing I'll concede from what you listed, the only one, is giving the series a 3, but honestly, I couldn't care less about the rating; what matters is the content. Which I believe you've misunderstood, frankly. Don't take it the wrong way, but I think I would have used less first-person singular and fewer "maybes" and various conditionals if I wanted to do "historical revisionism" (what a big word...). The funny thing is, I even said that I didn’t want to do sociology, eh... Moreover, it seems to me that you're the only one who has raised these criticisms among the comments, so, sorry if it didn’t seem so evident to me that I made a mistake. I don’t know what else to add because it really seems that you misunderstand everything I say. Anyway, I would end it here, as I don’t think we would change our position, would we?
Voto:
Anyway, mine has also collapsed... I don't know, I don't think I'll ever understand how these things work.
Similar users
Fallen

DeRank: 0,66

fenni

DeRank: 1,16

Gueddo666

DeRank: 0,99

Korn2

DeAge 6558

Bartleboom

DeRank: 35,89

Workhorse

DeRank: 6,75

pretazzo

DeRank: 3,14

Himself

DeRank: 0,00

aristogatto

DeRank: 0,37

Alì Murtacc

DeRank: 1,55