PIXELID

DeRank : 0,00
DeAge™ : 7325 days • Here since 21 may 2006
Queen Live Killers
Voto:
It seems to me that I superficially tried to explain why they were great while you didn't even make an effort.
Queen Live Killers
Voto:
Just because I like Queen doesn’t mean I only listen to them; you have no idea how many bands or artists I listen to. If someone listens to Queen, should they broaden their horizons? Why? Yet if someone listens to Schoolly D, that’s just fine? Look, just because someone listens to Queen doesn’t mean they only listen to that, but you take everything for granted. Anyway, I don’t want to be offensive; I’d just like you to explain your opinions.
Queen Live Killers
Voto:
leonid: if you shoot crap at something without valid arguments, it's not my fault! and if you tell me to go fuck myself, that only reinforces my opinion about you and the queens, since you can't even have the minimum basis to support your argument.
Queen Live Killers
Voto:
but what does it mean!!!!!!!!????? because if someone sells 800 billion copies it's crap and they haven't invented anything? is this really your two-bit reasoning? do you base your judgment of an album solely on that? well, tomorrow I’ll also release an album and after my relatives buy it, I can claim to be a great innovator! how wonderful! because I've sold the beauty of 5 albums!
since you think like this, let's start reconsidering: De André, Beatles, Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd, The Doors, Frank Zappa, Velvet Underground and so many others... because they are commercial phenomena and therefore it's scientifically and mathematically proven that they are as bad as the Blue, Britney Spears, and Hilary Duff.
Queen Live Killers
Voto:
tell me some plagiarized songs by Queen. since they copied a bit of everything, it shouldn't be difficult. Hits? have you ever listened to Queen in the 70s? Queen had huge success in Italy? come on!! maybe only one of their songs reached number one on the charts before Freddie's death. I'll just tell you that Queen's albums in Italy didn't sell more than 50 thousand copies!!!!!
given your position on Queen, can you provide some valid reasons. because until now you've only been saying that Queen sucks, they didn't invent anything, they copied from everyone, but never provided proof or even an example!! before you speak, it's better to be informed. go back to studying! (Quando ce vo' ce vo!)
Queen Live Killers
Voto:
see you next time bye
Queen Live Killers
Voto:
I see you only know Queen from the '80s, right? Listen to Queen from the '70s! Zero originality?! Who knows. Rhapsody? The March of...Queen, prop. song? The f...stroke? Bring Back That Leroy Brown? They aren't original; the sound of Queen is unique, not original! Innovation? They were pioneers of the music video, pioneers of the greatest hits, pioneers of glam alongside Marc Bolan and Bowie, etc. Technique may not be stellar, right? But in my opinion, that's a virtue; it enhances creativity. I've always hated overly technical bands like Dream Theater; they're too schematic and predictable. And I'd like to remind you that the greatest in history all had limited technical skills.
Queen Live Killers
Voto:
To write and interpret "bho.rapshody," "innuendo," "the march of the black queen," "white queen," etc., you must be a great artist. These are songs that marked an era! A minimum of objectivity!
Then I would like to understand, just because they suck, can you give me a valid explanation?
Queen Live Killers
Voto:
But those who buy Mino Reitano's CDs are elderly people who grew up with that music, and they don't even know what music is. They buy it just to reminisce a bit about the past. My grandfather was one of them.
But then, how can you compare the sales of people like Mino Reitano with those of Queen? Queen appeals to almost everyone, and that's their strength: they please those who know nothing about music, those who know a lot, metalheads, rockers, pop fans, house music lovers...etc. And perhaps Queen deserves at least a little bit of credit?
Queen Live Killers
Voto:
Well, guys, it’s normal that not everyone likes a certain singer or band, but still, you can't say they suck; you always have to specify that they suck for me. It’s like writing a review about spaghetti with clams; not everyone will like it, but you can't say it’s awful; instead, you can say it’s awful for me. Thank goodness everyone has their own tastes; otherwise, what a drag it would be! Sorry for my somewhat twisted reasoning, but it’s to get the idea across.