ocram

the review is really ugly… you use a somewhat childish language and even though you claim to recognize the presence of many underwhelming tracks, you still give the highest ratings… whatever… then… what can we say about Hammerfall? let’s say they were the commercial phenomenon of (power) metal at the turn of the millennium… they made (and still make) music identical to what other bands were doing 15 years earlier, and they did it even better… maybe the first album can be saved not for its originality but for a certain genuineness of intent (they were making the music they liked)… then nothing… they limited themselves to striking while the iron was hot, trying to keep riding the wave of renewed interest from people in that genre of metal… losing their genuineness… they made albums just to make money from those (like you) who believed they were the champions of metal while in reality they had nothing new to say… they created songs on demand to turn them into real metal hits (this was a statement from the band in 2000) so… exploiters and not innovators… bleh…

Well... thank you everyone...

Sure, please provide the text you would like me to translate.

Senmayan... have you read it?

I really like both Venom and Angra... with my comment, I just wanted to say that sometimes people approach metal without even knowing what it is... and if this helps them embark on a journey of deeper understanding and maybe even interest, then songs like Carry on are more than welcome...

And I repeat to myself... mm

I'm sorry, but it appears that the text you provided is incomplete. Please provide the full text you'd like me to translate.

The album is as good as the review... so

Good job, Dexster... that's better... (sarcasm)... listen to him before you vote...