fusillo

@Mopaga; Very kind... Frankly, I wasn't thinking of something so tragic, I was thinking about the usual disagreements among pop band members. I’ll look into it online. Bye. And hi to you too, Sfascia...

WHAT??? AMON DUUL II TELL FRANK ZAPPA AND JIMI HENDRIX TO GET LOST??? It's one thing for Floyd, Velvet, etc., but ZAPPA AND HENDRIX? And didn’t Ed Hall already tell thirty years of rock music to get lost? And what about between them? What do Ed Hall and Amon Duul II do? Do they tell each other to get lost? Look, Festwca, despite the fancy language of these characters, your review isn't nice. IT'S ABSOLUTELY BEAUTIFUL!!! :)

I have never listened to the Manic Street Preachers, whom I only know by name, and this new James Dean is the first time I've heard his name. Just out of curiosity, what are their known issues?

I rewrote a part of my post: "I suggest Odradek buy 'O primeiro canto' and Socrates 'Lagrimas' and 'Camhinos,' if and only if that doesn't send your accounts into the red." Better this way, right? Bye. :)

I find it a bit hard to think of him as a God, but the reception is nice. I won't judge the album even though you let me hear some songs. We’ve already talked about those. Bye.

I liked Madredeus a lot when Rodrigo Leão was there. I still like them even though Carlos Maria Trindade is involved. But the best of all is Dulce Pontes. I suggest Odradek buy "O primeiro canto" and Socrates "Lagrimas" and "Camhinos." On Camhinos there’s my favorite track by Dulce, "Lela," and I get chills just thinking about it... The reception is nice Odradek and the Samples too. Bye.

I've only listened to them once. They don't say much to me, like the other Italian prog bands except for PFM. The review is brief, but frankly, I wouldn't know what else to say. Bye.

Isis, but why should I settle for just two 4s? Aren't two 5s better?

Isis, but why should I settle for just two 4s? Aren't two 5s better?

Reading your post, Hal, I was reminded of Brecht's Galileo: his obsession with a truth based on observation and reasoning (the only means that allow us to separate the true from the false) contrasted with the truth of faith. His love for the good life and fine dining, but also his cunning: he sold telescopes as if they were his own invention just to fund his research. It's beautiful that he used the telescope not for the military purposes for which it was designed—observing the movements of potential enemies... He pointed the telescope to the sky to see the movements of the stars and from them understood that the Earth moves too. And finally, his inability to endure physical pain, the reason why he would publicly renounce his theses when faced with the threat of torture. In short, to put it plainly, a man with his virtues and flaws... Thank you, Hal, for steering the discussion back on track. I think we've wasted too much time on ancillary issues (don't take it personally, Zarathustra...). And I'll also try to listen to "Lost in the Stars," even though I really can't stand Nick Cave. :)