Viva Lì

DeRank : 0,32
DeAge™ : 7375 days • Here since 1 april 2006
U2 Wide Awake in America
Voto:
In between "The Unforgettable Fire" and "The Joshua Tree." Basically, in between two masterpieces. It’s obvious then that the result couldn’t be excellent. But it is still a thoughtful and powerful live album, dignified and heartfelt, a demonstration (but I've been repeating this for months now) of how, during that period, U2 managed to produce very respectable albums even though they weren’t in great shape or great condition. And that is an achievement. Marco Poletti Dixit.
U2 War
U2 War
22 may 06
Voto:
Not the best of U2, but undoubtedly one of the most straightforward and effective. The de-reviewer did an excellent job, it's really a case to commend them. Marco Poletti Dixit.
U2 Under A Blood Red Sky
Voto:
The U2 are lackluster. And it shows. However, despite everything, they still manage to amaze and, all in all, make us reflect as well. 35 minutes of nice music, but not great. Marco Poletti Dixit.
U2 Three
U2 Three
22 may 06
Voto:
Frankly, I don't know him. But is he still on the market? Marco Poletti Dixit.
U2 The Unforgettable Fire
Voto:
The most daring and effective masterpiece by U2. Depth and elegance: these are the entry tickets to fully understand how spectacular and fundamental U2 were for rock music in the 80s and 90s. Bono sings beautifully, and The Edge's guitar touches notes and emotions we could never have dared to imagine. A glorious, stunning album (those who don't know it should go buy it right away), where fundamental themes like war, peace, love, hate, races, and peoples are merely a pretext to talk about the world and the greedy (and often petty) natural luciferian comfort of humanity. With homage to Martin Luther King. And then there's "Pride (In the name of love)", honestly, does that seem like little to you? Marco Poletti Dixit.
U2 The Joshua Tree
Voto:
The masterpieces of U2 are numerous ("Boy," "The Unforgettable Fire," "Achtung Baby"), and "The Joshua Tree" is perhaps the least original. Fewer ideas and less courage compared to "The Unforgettable Fire," but stronger and more focused songs. A handful of tracks that have gone down in history and that, despite countless music-related debates, have become part of rock legend: "With or Without You," "I Still Haven't Found What I'm Looking For," but it is especially the epoch-making "Where the Streets Have No Name" that enriches this highly effective musical masterpiece (with vital contributions from Brian Eno and Daniel Lanois). In a way, it could be labeled as the U2's "Sgt. Peppers" (with all the differences and nuances that implies). Marco Poletti Dixit.
U2 Rattle And Hum
Voto:
Soundtrack, partly live, is a great example of how, even if not particularly inspired, U2 manage to produce works of such greatness that they dispel any doubt about their skill (and ease) in compensating for any shortcomings or deficiencies. They reinterpret Dylan and the Beatles, duet with B.B. King, and even pay tribute to Billie Holiday and John Lennon. Not everything is perfect, but U2 are now history, and they can afford anything. Marco Poletti Dixit.
U2 Pop
U2 Pop
22 may 06
Voto:
The U2 have surprised us several times (and the results have always been excellent), but now they are going overboard: they convert to dance and inevitably get overwhelmed. Gloomy and apocalyptic, they record the dreadful "Discotheque" but make up for it with "On Earth." Don't worry, it's just a phase; they'll soon return bright and sharp like (or almost) twenty years ago. Marco Poletti Dixit.
U2 October
U2 October
22 may 06
Voto:
Surely inferior to "Boy", it is also longer and more boring. The U2 did not have completely clear ideas, or perhaps, given the enormous success of the first album, they thought it best to copy rather than invent anything groundbreaking. The fact is that, even when they show little enthusiasm, they still come across as very sharp and lively. And some tracks are indeed a pleasant surprise (notably "Gloria"). Marco Poletti Dixit.
U2 How to dismantle an atomic bomb
Voto:
It's not the best among U2's albums (and it wouldn't be), but it's a decent, solid work, honestly professional, and, all things considered, quite enjoyable as well. Sure, it lacks the courage and energy of the old days, but it's impressive to have a band in such good shape after more than twenty years of an honorable career. Today, they certainly far surpass the four rolling old men (a.k.a. the Rolling Stones). Marco Poletti Dixit.