zaireeka

Of course it was a truly beautiful concert. Looking back, it would have been even "more perfect" if they had also played, in addition to Rapace and Pelle, Ritorno a Casa, Male in Polvere, and Il Compleanno di Andrea. But maybe there would have been too many tears shed...

Of Taranto. Telling you where I was isn't easy (as you say, there were 1500 of us). I was about 5 meters from the stage and I was wearing blue shorts and a red sweater...

And down with the charming idiots who haven't understood that the most immoral thing is banality!!!

I understand from your review that it was difficult to describe the experience. I agree on two points: 1) That it was the most emotional concert I have ever attended 2) That the version of Oceano di Gomma was worth the ticket price by itself. Few are capable of composing pieces of such heart-wrenching and wonderful melancholy.

It's impossible. But did you write it the night of the concert? I wanted to write it!!! It was one of the "most extraordinary" concerts I've ever attended and by far the most emotional. I've never sung so loudly at a concert, and often had to hold back (like during Dentro Marilyn) due to a lump in my throat that wouldn't go down. This time, Agnelli didn't punch a stupid fan like at the Filmore, but rather reached the more emotionally dormant part of me (and I don't think it was just me). And what a wonder to see the 6-piece group with violin, flute, electric guitars (I felt like I was watching King Crimson from the Larks era), bass, and keyboards. And the duets with four hands (the "Renaissance" version of Come Vorrei was stunning, wild, and light). And the multi-instrumentalist playing saxophone and keyboards in parallel. And to think how it all started with that thin and threatening rain that seemed set to ruin everything. Long live the unpleasant and the snobby if they're all like Manuel Agnelli. PS. Do you know if a live DVD of these concerts is planned?

A Night at the Opera resembles A Family Entertainment?? I really didn't notice this resemblance at all!! The thing I like least about this album is the audio quality (in my opinion, there's no point in buying the remastered version since I have that one too, and in my view, it leaves a lot to be desired).

Staff, to address the real problem of duplicate reviews (which can sometimes get out of hand), I would like to propose a solution. It should consist of: 1) Forcibly preventing the writing of reviews for albums that have already been reviewed, 2) Every time a review is commented on, bringing it to the top of the "DeRecensioni.Ultime" column, indicating whether they are not actually the latest published but simply the latest commented on (ideally, these should coincide). Alternatively, a new column could be created. This way, if someone wants to share their thoughts on an album and wants to ensure that their opinion is read (it’s only human for many to desire this), they wouldn't be forced to write yet another "new" review. I know there is a reporting mechanism via email, but this might be more effective. Hi, and sorry for the intrusion. Additionally, I would prohibit anonymous users from leaving comments. After all, these days it doesn’t take much to open an email account and create a password. Long live and cheers to DeBaser. PS. Sorry if I occasionally let my (unfortunately) inner IT person come out.

Zara, for goodness' sake, your opinion is more than welcome, even if I don't share your view.

Floyd, from you who are so passionate and knowledgeable, I would love to hear your opinion on Obscured by Clouds. For me, it is a beautifully moving album that leaves me with a sweet aftertaste of melancholy with every listen (especially Burning Bridges and Stay). Moreover, I believe there are many ideas that were later developed in the more acclaimed works.

The votes