sexyajax

hahahahahaha...this piece doesn’t go beyond a 2.5. hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahah, hahahahahahahahah, hahahahahahahahah.
ok, you’re right!

here's yet another wise speaker, watch the movie, then you'll understand how it wants to portray a snapshot of '94 that’s completely disconnected from reality and how it has used not only the title but many analogies with Do the Right Thing by Spike Lee. give me a break with this nonsense.

Beautiful page, in my opinion the blame lies with mass culture and media bombardment; your son today doesn’t want Ken Parker, he wants Gormiti!?!

Panapp, my desire to review works from the 21st century stems from the assumption that they are rarely discussed, that the concepts guiding them are underestimated, and that they are original and "antisystem" to the extent that perhaps someone might change their mind about the events of our century upon seeing the work, realizing the problem of enslavement in our time, the contradictions of post-modernism... As for what I think of the Palatine Chapel, Caravaggio, Giotto, Michelangelo, and Leonardo, well, I have nothing to say, of course; I miss the sacred monsters of the past. Today, in this consumerist Middle Ages, resurrecting them seems too obvious and trite. The Virgin of the Rocks, I don't know, bringing back the Mona Lisa or Michelangelo's David, in addition to making examples of the Ninja Turtles, I think our ancestors have already said everything there is to say. ------- Regarding the fact that you rated the work a 3, it is evident that your view of today is positivist and supportive of those in power. My vision (unfortunately) is nihilistic, so I can only mythologize these last flickers of free ideas in a nation where freedom is censored.

but the vigilante is lacking in substance as well as envious, I’m happy to be the antagonist of the negative character, positive vibration yeah POSITIVES! LIVE IF YOU WANNA LIVE SEXYHIGHMAN VIBRATION YEAH POSITIVES!

garbage movie... I would like to see you at work, delarge mister nobody!

47---->denies imagination when it shows the cutting of the clitoris, when penetration is visible, when you see her drilling her leg with a tool from the 1700s.

you didn't "appreciate" it...mmm..."judgment"...i'll tell who you are under the sun, we are the children of the highman...

In my philosophy of the totally banal, I tell you that "uncertain" referred to what they represented; I was wrong to attribute it to the brushstroke. The figure is uncertain, and the brushstrokes are, of course, intentional...

If you saw her face, you would notice the incredible naturalness of the girl. As for the clothes, they are almost invisible due to the stroke that is uniquely hers, without looking for particulars and details; the dress seems to float in water, while the face is the fixed and defined component.