marco85

DeRank ™: 0,00

DeAge™ : 7390 days • Here since 18 march 2006

Love Contact

Michael Angelo No Boundaries

23 may 06

Voto:

then: petrucci, gilbert, lane, holdsworth, gambale, howe, macalpine etcetera etceterarum

Michael Angelo No Boundaries

23 may 06

Voto:

faster guitarists than Angelo: Vai, Satriani, Malmsteen. I'm saying this based on sheet music reading. Not for impression or opinion. Do you know them, shark? Never heard of them?

Michael Angelo No Boundaries

23 may 06

Voto:

the reverse sweeps hurt him so much, it's really dirty, no doubt about it

Michael Angelo No Boundaries

23 may 06

Voto:

And when it comes to technical difficulty, there's much worse, that's for sure "super virtuous par excellence."

for matt7: "The good Angelo runs fast, incredibly fast. The technical sequences are nothing short of absurd." "unimaginable speed" someone who plays 21 notes in a second doesn't write these things. Also, because Angelo in this album doesn't even come close to 21 notes in a second, not even by mistake.

Michael Angelo No Boundaries

23 may 06

Voto:

Shark: FIRST I talked about technique (he's dirty with his left hand when he plays the legato, SO he's not a monster with the two-neck guitar) THEN about speed. You really need a nice Italian course, not just semiotics.

Michael Angelo No Boundaries

23 may 06

Voto:

Shark, you’ve really worn me out. Seriously, either you’re in it or you’re not. Same situation as passion and warfare. Please reread what I wrote and THEN we’ll talk about it again.

Michael Angelo No Boundaries

23 may 06

Voto:

it's not something to agree on. there are numbers that don’t lie. so, two plus two is an opinion as well. please, before saying it's not true, that speed is maximum (?!) look at the sheets with the staff. and read them. the video I saw is that famous star licks, and when he plays legato with the left hand, it’s messy and very (also extremely awkward). technically, I said he is good. there are billions of jazz musicians who surpass him by a long shot (I was referring to speed for this and NOT technique, and now I have to reiterate it, try to read what I write).