marco85

DeRank ™: 0,00

DeAge™ : 7389 days • Here since 18 march 2006

Love Contact

Robbie Williams Intensive Care

26 jul 06

Voto:

Greek mythology is a whole different ballgame.

Robbie Williams Intensive Care

26 jul 06

Voto:

And where do you place the Egyptians?

Robbie Williams Intensive Care

26 jul 06

Voto:

The church does not prevent anyone from interpreting the Bible in their own way; it simply takes a stand on theories it does not agree with.

Robbie Williams Intensive Care

26 jul 06

Voto:

Come on, what kind of talk is that! The whole medieval European culture was based on the beliefs found in the Old Testament (ancient compared to the Church), and now it's the Church's fault that we slept until Copernicus! Please...

DJ Tiësto Adagio For Strings

25 jul 06

Voto:

Sure, please provide the text you would like me to translate.

DJ Tiësto Adagio For Strings

25 jul 06

Voto:

but what does Malmsteen have to do with it? I'm missing something...

Hole Celebrity Skin

25 jul 06

Voto:

krystal you said it right: artistE :-))))))

Charlie Chaplin City Lights

23 jul 06

Voto:

The same goes for Kubrick XD

Charlie Chaplin City Lights

23 jul 06

Voto:

Sure, after all, it’s so incredible precisely because of this, as you said so well, “meeting of souls”… yet I believe it still holds a meaning in the story of the film, I don’t think it’s simply an exercise in poetic art (though magnificent)... The expression of the florist is a bit problematic to interpret :-) it could also be one of tenderness… The Oscar ceremony is indeed scandalous… Titanic won 13 statuettes! Dances with Wolves and Forrest Gump 6 statuettes! While Chaplin won only 3 throughout his entire career!

Charlie Chaplin City Lights

23 jul 06

Voto:

@zarathustra (but it's open to everyone): I recently watched the film again and I have to admit you're right. And I'll tell you more: I believe that the very music (which, as I've already pointed out, enlivens the characters' inner worlds) leads us to this conclusion. In fact, that poignant and beautiful musical passage (from the recognition of the vagabond onward) was already present in an earlier scene; and while in that scene a wall separated the vagabond from his beloved (even though he could see her through a window), at the end, the two are still separated by a wall (an ideal wall but never so tangible) aptly represented by Charlot's expression of shame. Could it be?