Adriano Bernard

Fusillo, this time you've hit the mark. Also seen live in Portugal.

In short, battlegods: by eating an entire cake instead of your slice, you take away slices from everyone else. You take it all for yourself, leaving no room for others. It's called "respect for other people" or, as you might find it easier to call it, the "I'm not going to eat it all myself."

Battle, I think bartleboom was referring to "I didn't send two in a day, but two in two days," which indicates that you didn't understand anything of what bartleboom meant. The "sending two reviews a day" was a paradox, an exaggeration... The meaning was that you shouldn't send them often, and one a day is more than often. I don't know: two reviews a week, right? Also to ensure a certain quality of documentation and writing, in short. I think that with a pace of two reviews a week, you would have the time to write them more accurately, to choose more intelligently and confidently what you want to review, and it would also give you time for more research on both the group and the album. Comparing it to a cake, you instead just made a similar statement: "But I don't eat two cakes a day, I eat one!" As if one cake a day were too few. It's clear that it then appears as a provocation. For the rest, I agree with everything bartle said, except about Americans, even though they're not here :-)

Yes. It's so unknown that by now I was convinced it didn't exist...

to the face of no one :-)

Exactly, "officialized." To invent and to anticipate is another thing.

*missouri sky

Well, the sermon is over, which as usual, no one will pay attention to, let's move on to the album: I listened to it just today, and it's of wild beauty. Melancholic, it reminds me of other instrumental works I've enjoyed in the past. To the reviewer: I believe these works might interest you. Look for "Aquadia" by the Neapolitan Lino Cannavacciuolo: almost solely electric violin, truly stunning. The same goes for Pat Metheny's albums: "A Map of the World" and "Beyond the Missouri Sky": solo acoustic guitar. I also recommend giving "Colma" by Buckethead a listen, an ambient work of just electric guitar. Best regards.

For the rest, I agree with TinyBanks: if we look at both the present and the past, we realize that despite having some brilliant minds, we have mostly been and still are a swarm of infesting termites, destroying everything in their path without respect for the planet or for other living beings and our own kind. Another thing that shouldn't be done, in my opinion, is to confuse the little word "god" with the value given by the worship of the religious "god." Also because we humans can know and understand the HOW, not the WHY. The reason for all this remains unknown to us, assuming there is one. Personally, I always start from the idea that there is a reason for everything; also because so far I've never encountered anything without a reason; if something is without a reason, it is precisely because I do not know it. Not because there is no reason. So call it god, call it "the reason," call it nature, call it pincopallino, call it whatever you want: there is a possibility that it exists just as there is a possibility that it does not. Since we know next to nothing, we can only hypothesize: being "atheists" is very similar to being religious; both are answers given to a question regarding a topic on which we are completely ignorant. The most dignified thing, considering our ignorance, is to remain silent or to hypothesize.

Psycroptic, do you know Italian? You should know that it's a very complicated language, which includes the so-called "idioms." Never heard of those? Furthermore, if you had continued reading, instead of stopping to be a pesky brat stirring up dust over a trivial matter, you would have read, referring to the cello, "paraphrase of the human voice." Does that ring a bell? Clearly, listening to too much metal has fried your neurons worse than THC; you see priests everywhere. Now, let me explain something: the institution of the church has been around for over 2000 years and has always been consistently present and powerful (even today); Italian has existed for just a little over 1000 years, and we're talking about vulgar Latin. Now, how do you think Italian hasn’t "inherited" clerical or religious idioms? But come on, think a little. We are also very happy about your live performance to stir up a hornet's nest in a review that had a harmony and intimacy almost sacred: we really needed that. Oh my God, I said sacred... for God's sake... oh God, I said "God"... damn it, I said "oh God"...