Adriano Bernard

The funniest and most original review of the month and the most superficial, trivial, and pointless film in the history of cinema (like 80% of Spielberg's filmography).

The story is "nice," by King’s standards. I'm sure the movie is crap even though I haven't seen it (like Desperation, by the way). You should check out "The Last Eclipse," an adaptation of King’s work that is practically unknown and underrated. With the actress who played Misery :-). Anyway, King is among my favorite authors, and I can say that 95% of the films adapted from his novels are ridiculous and useless. I cast my vote based on trust. Sanjuro, you’re a poor idiot for copy-pasting your pathetic lines on all the reviews. You’re truly a loser. PS: they gave me a DVD for PC with the little book, which I found almost useless. Has anyone else received it?

Have you noticed that the voice actor for the dragon sounds like an Albanian airport announcer? (no offense to Albanians, it's just that for a dragon, that type of voice is ridiculous!) I read the first book and I liked it, but I was twelve or thirteen: now I would puke over it. Yes, the names are pathetic and the book is a mix between The Lord of the Rings and the Knights of the Round Table. Garbatorix is the villain, with the final x :-)

I found it a mix of ridiculousness, vomit-inducing Spielbergian elements, and patheticness. In reality, the second adjective also encompasses the other two...

"Nothing is permitted for me to say that is not an ambiguous willing intention of this vain identity of mine; movement is its negation, subject to the necessity of the name as resignation to fate, just as everything interdisciplinary undisciplines me in the aesthetic de-gender, I have even degraded myself to being a re-censor." ----> but what the hell does that mean? Did you take a dictionary and randomly open it, copying 30 forgotten words from the Italian language and shaping them so that they resembled a sentence? I mean, I already didn't understand a damn thing about the film, and now I can't understand a damn thing about the review either?

But take your risks elsewhere given what you're saying. Did you smoke a joint before leaving that comment? :-)

I’ve stopped, dear :) What about you, are you still happily snorting before work?:-)))

are you really spamming it on the others too? you’re just looking for attention, thirteen-year-old :-). @ waldo: it was you who attacked: if you don’t like Punisher's reviews, don’t read them, you have no right to come here and say he should go on vacation. Who do you think you are, his father? if you throw a stone, be ready to face the consequences: no crocodile tears, please :-). PS: By the way, this is also a serious review, so... if it had been nonsense, I’d understand. And then there are people on the site who write reviews more frequently and others who write less often: but you don’t have the right to criticize them, especially since they are respectable reviews. Sail away from here, then! @ Sanjuro: I’m waiting for the next nonsense you write and pass off as a review: are you already thinking about it? who will sink your immeasurable ego, maybe Lynch? Or are you going to go with Fellini? :-)). @ Punisher: I’m waiting for your msn address in a private message ;)

The first three lines lower your average, I think...

minghione, why instead of going to whores don't you remind me of your MSN address?