Adriano Bernard

Write to the editors, unless the one who signed as "editor" is not really an editor, in which case it means that debaser is corrupted to the core...

:))))))))))))))))9 And do you know Porcupine Tree?

sexy, write to the editors. There will soon be a lynching in the public square.

"The Marx of music that nonetheless combined individualistic demands of symbolic interactionism. The Queen? Absolutely disengaged music, purely Wildean in style, where THERE WAS ABSOLUTELY NO ROOM FOR ETHICS, where music was not meant to teach anything to anyone, as it did not make the listener better or intellectually superior. I completely agree with you, and this is exactly why I find the Queen, both musically and symbolically, distinctly inferior to Pink Floyd."

FUCKING SHIT OF JUDAS, YOU ARE CLOGGING MY INBOX, YOU SON OF A BITCH!!!! SEИХY ASK THE EDITORS WHO THE HELL THIS PIECE OF SHIT IS!!!!!

"PINK FLOYD are THE MUSIC, it's true"... well then we agree. What I wanted to say is that anyway the Queen have fallen with commercial nonsense, patriotic nonsense like WE ARE THE CHAMPIONS and WE WILL ROCK YOU. That's it. The end.

But fuck off, sexy ask the editors...

As for me, I couldn't care less about those mediocre Stratovarius, given what they are and the "music" they make.

The Queen have done a lot for music, certainly, but there’s just no way they can be compared to Pink Floyd.

And I point out the difference in how the Pink Floyd play the guitar and how Queen play it. I want to highlight that Queen created some poppy, patriotic, sugary hits while the Pink Floyd never stooped to those levels. The difference is that Pink Floyd were composers (and Roger Waters still is, as he shows us with "Ca Ira") while Queen were nothing more than a simple rock band. They didn’t expand musical horizons, didn’t invent a genre, didn’t create musical masterpieces, didn’t build the history of music. And if we want to see who today fits into the modern "myths and geniuses," there are also Nirvana, according to many, but what did Nirvana do for music besides churn out four commercial and simplistic songs?! The fact that "The Dark Side of the Moon" is composed of little songs is nonsense; we both know this, the idea isn’t even worth considering.