Festwca

You have enchanted me. (@iside: preparing the rough draft and correcting it seems to me the least one can do, at the very least out of respect for the readers)

Well, in my opinion, the review is well-written and it grabbed me. The vulgarity in the language is very impactful and effectively conveys the underlying idea, clearly illustrating the squalor that the reviewer wants to describe. Then, an intro like this, whether agreeable or not, presents the album in a very effective way, worth more than a sterile technical description.

Nevertheless, here and there you say the right things: "eccentric/dislexic" are two very fitting attributes, "alien and radioactive" as well. Best regards.

1) The trilogy of albums was not called 1, 2, and 3, but "Neu!", "Neu!2," and "Neu!75," and they dated back to '71, '73, and '75, not all to '73. 2) The track-by-track descriptions are annoying, and this one in particular is a bit too concise and pointless. 3) "rendered so unique by a new, edgy, and free rock vein that, many years later, will pave the way for something called new wave, which is already anticipated in the aesthetics of their album covers": in my opinion, this sentence is completely off the mark. It wasn’t rendered unique by a new rock vein, but rather by experiments with rhythm, repetitiveness, and remixing. I don't see what the cover has to do with new wave; if anything, it relates more to pop-art. And the album doesn't anticipate that movement; rather, it reflects the punk of the Sex Pistols (Johnny Rotten had listened to a lot of kraut).

Did I say "review," by any chance?

No no no carnefrisca, this is just not it, the review is too short, filled with errors and inaccuracies, it doesn’t do justice to an IMMENSE album like Neu!2. Plus, the review was already there, so why redo it? (don’t take it personally, we’re just waiting for a proper job next time, after all it’s a debut review, right?)

Always good, KrystaL. Personally, instead of the annoying summer hit, this summer I'll listen to some autumnal post-rock and angry noise-industrial records, byez.

Perfect, so I prefer Hendrix because he's more revolutionary and you prefer Page because he's more traditional. Points of view.

Anyway, Hendrix was a disgusting commercial phenomenon, watered down by record companies (like many bands), the first album is the only one I willingly listen to.

try to experience something live. Try to watch the live at Woodstock where he performs the national anthem.