easycure

Oops, sorry. Comment above from:

I conclude what I wrote above.. that after listening to Aerosmith '72-'78, '80s hard rock with BJe GNR is totally U-S-E-L-E-S-S.

Of course I have heard G'n'R. "Appetite for Destruction," "Lies," and the two "Use Your Illusion"; conclusion: a mediocre band with some flashes of decent melodic ideas, which, by the way, are never less than obsolete in their rejection of any attempt at modernization, either due to a lack of will or more likely inability. From here, I turn the question back to you: have you ever heard Aerosmith? But not "I don't want to miss a thing," rather the period '72-'78. I should mention that I don't like Aerosmith either, but the point is that the sterile '80s hard rock of BJ and even more so G'n'R is all there, in Aerosmith's early albums.

no no no, Francesco, that's not it; anyone can say this about any charlatan who has the nerve to call themselves an artist. I analyzed the music for you, do the same, THIS is what it means to argue.

In short, do you want to proceed with this question yes or no?

Speaking of arguments: perhaps you missed it, but my comment on 22/10 thoroughly expressed my thoughts on BJ… maybe it slipped your mind? Well, distractions happen... go read it again because everything is there, and if you allow me, it's a bit hard for me to repeat it, so I certainly won’t rewrite it just to make you happy… Instead, you, Franceschino, why have you never explained to us why Bon Jovi is so great? Guys, guys, before rambling on about "not having arguments for a serious discussion," THINK, or you'll end up shooting yourselves in the foot. ;)

"you're just playing the victim," all sacrosanct truths Francesco.. and why not.. perhaps just slightly tendentious? ..well, let it go.. Tell me, tell me, rather, what question did you want to ask me? ..I'll be happy to answer you.

Chapter 9) "Jessy's yet another answer" See chapter 5

Nice review, and a very interesting topic! ; )

Chapter 8) "the other protagonists" Among the fanatical worshippers of the god BJ was also a certain Dan, who claimed, listen carefully, that the Beatles weren't rock, rock was born around the '70s, and "Back in Black" is the greatest album in history. Obviously, the BJs are in seventh place, in the top ten but not at the top because they are also humble and don’t want to weigh their immense greatness on others. In front of such an incredibly innovative version of music history from 1950 to 2000, the party poopers from De-basero still made some claims, but Dan the Superior avoided addressing his unusual arguments, not because he didn't know how to handle them, obviously, but rather because with great maturity and superiority he deemed discussion unnecessary. Moral: "the history of rock is very, very relative" and should be rewritten by DAN!"