easycure

DeRank ™: 3,14

DeAge™ : 8125 days • Here since 13 march 2004

Love Contact

The Cure Kiss Me Kiss Me Kiss Me

9 jun 06

Voto:

that's because you don't even realize you have them, poor tatameo :-)

Dream Theater Metropolis Pt. 2: Scenes From a Memory

9 jun 06

Voto:

Why do you think he and the one above are different people? :-) I know, and it's easy to imagine... eheheheh ;-) ..anyway, innovation is important, but as I've mentioned in many posts, what is fundamental is originality. And as I've said before, originality and innovation are complementary concepts but quite different: to clarify, the Cure are original but far from innovative.

The Cure Kiss Me Kiss Me Kiss Me

9 jun 06

Voto:

well of course you'll never be able to reach me.. but that was obvious hehe a big kiss to you too my little ball-less favorite delight hehehahahah :-D

Dream Theater Metropolis Pt. 2: Scenes From a Memory

9 jun 06

Voto:

x lux: you disappoint me :-) I never claimed that the Cure are innovative, nor would I ever dream of saying that. A two-week discussion with Orione, in which you also took part, and you still think that innovation is so crucial for me? :-)

Dream Theater Metropolis Pt. 2: Scenes From a Memory

9 jun 06

Voto:

"very good in the dialectics of insults" x Socrates (presumably the usual anonymous) I'm sorry for you, but I have never insulted anyone except in response to other insults. It's all above, just go reread :-) so please avoid making a fool of yourself with other nonsense.

Dream Theater Metropolis Pt. 2: Scenes From a Memory

9 jun 06

Voto:

x leipzig: "Guys, I listened to the Cure when I was 12!! And honestly, I’ve evolved musically quite a bit since then. Then I come here and see a guy trashing a band that is really playing, while he adores the Cure without seeing beyond his nose, meaning they are clearly inferior in every aspect to the Dream Theater!!" And so what? Just because you listened to them at 12, the Cure is an inferior band? Hahahah :-D What do you want to prove? Would this be a demonstration? But then, when have I ever compared the DT to the Cure in my review? So why are you doing it? If you don’t know what to say, maybe it’s better if you just stay quiet, guys :-) you’re kind of sad.

Dream Theater Metropolis Pt. 2: Scenes From a Memory

9 jun 06

Voto:

"has turned into a caricature defending the indefensible, which is essentially the independence of art from technique" you know, just to say, but this is a concept dear to giants like Picasso, I certainly didn’t invent it: moreover, I have never absolutized the discourse to ALL art, but it is certainly a discourse that can be easily applied to rock. There's really nothing indefensible. To judge it as such, evidently you don't have a sufficiently deep knowledge of rock. Come back after you've listened to a few hundred records, I can recommend some if you want ehehehe ;-)

Dream Theater Metropolis Pt. 2: Scenes From a Memory

9 jun 06

Voto:

:-) dear Bergstein (presumably the usual anonymous), "you’ve taken so many hits left and right against those boulders known as the real world" ..apart from the lack of sense in this sentence (what did you really mean? Who knows..) I’m sorry to disappoint you, but I haven’t been hit by anyone :-) In the best case scenario, there have been nice discussions that ended with anything but a change in my opinions. In the worst case, I simply had to “whack” presumptuous frauds like you, without this bothering me at all and, in fact, with considerable amusement (otherwise I wouldn’t have spent so much time here, would I?) ..it seems you’ve found the dumbest (not to mention the most predictable) excuse to attack me, eheheh :-)

Dream Theater Metropolis Pt. 2: Scenes From a Memory

9 jun 06

Voto:

for Larrok: so what else should I tell you :-) if you hear Portnoy like that, good for you. I have an opposite view. We've reached the point where the discussion ends with a: opinions.

Dream Theater Metropolis Pt. 2: Scenes From a Memory

9 jun 06

Voto:

So let’s start :-) For Fred: I say that technique has never been understood nor exploited solely for what you assert; technique in its normal sense follows exactly the opposite of your reasoning. We start with technique first, then we arrive at knowledge and therefore at experience. In this sense, it often becomes a closure, a stylistic device, an exercise in style, a banality, especially in rock where technique understood this way is NOT fundamental. In your definition, it is obvious that it is the foundation of any art, but I don't think that your definition, unfortunately, is the one normally followed. :-)