easycure

I confirm what Godbowl said. I don't find them either so influential or so indispensable as you claim. And then, with a group like My Bloody Valentine behind them, it doesn't seem to me that Spacemen 3 have added anything particularly different. So, in my opinion, there are other bands that are more influential. This, however, doesn’t take away from the fact that they are a more than pleasant band.

Oh how nice, how nice, finally this review comes to life. tommy90d, I hope that 90 doesn't stand for your birth year.. :-)

I also had to order it... but I don’t believe that you don’t like it, no no :-D

I wanted to review it myself some time ago.. but I still haven't listened to it all, it's a bit excessive in length :-) ..anyway, as a somewhat explicitly intellectual piece, it's really beautiful.

the name had always intrigued me.. after reading your review, so did the music

Always a big wreck. Regards to (dis)measure. I'm not particularly intrigued by skeletal proposals, but between one download and another, I might make an exception.

In fact, I have never spoken of mysticism, because to me it seems anything but a record permeated with mysticism. The idea of giving a more precise idea of the tracks is a very relative discussion: if describing each track aimed to elicit the emotions that each piece conveys, it would then be a pretentious and pointless operation. First, because every review should not take away the pleasure of discovery; second, because assuming that one’s own emotions are necessarily something that others must share would be presumptuous and ridiculous. If, however, the aim of describing each track were motivated purely by the functional need to describe the album as accurately as possible, this too would be futile: presuming that every album has a certain expressive homogeneity, describing each piece is logically unnecessary. If, on the other hand, an album makes heterogeneity one of its characteristics, then dwelling on each track is even more misleading, as it makes you lose a distant perspective that is fundamental to grasping the album in its various nuances. This is to better clarify my point of view. As for anonymous comments, no problem. I have been writing here for 3 years and have abundantly dealt with sad individuals who don’t even have the courage to discuss openly. I know how to humiliate them, but I repeat, they don’t bother me at all, so I reserve the right not to provoke bitter humiliations ;-) bye

A bit pathetic the "new wave" of debaser.. it's not like not ending up in the chosen reviews is the end of the world come on.. how sad.. :-D I'm glad I piqued Domo's curiosity and anyway I think zione would really like it too; for me it's an album that truly rocks, like really. Beyond my opinion, I still think it's hard not to consider it at least interesting. Anyway, what everyone here would like the most is Psychopompe. Too bad he hasn't reached out. Big kiss to everyone.

bisius, frankly, citing every song seems useless to me, and it has always seemed useless to me except for my early reviews. It’s a rather childish trick as well as a waste of time in 90% of the cases (in my opinion). The "big picture" allows you to grasp the essence of an album; focusing on each piece makes you lose it. kosmina, I’m sorry you think that... well, the album is worth it to me, and a lot (so dogbowl, in my opinion, 16 euros is very well spent!)

Beautiful!