Senmayan

Mom, how bitter you are, Pier Paolo Farina. Here everyone expresses their opinion; if you don't like it, go elsewhere. I don't think anyone has offended you; in fact, I've even said that yours is a nice review!

Good job, you spark curiosity, but you did more of a retrospective than a review of this album!

No bisius, you shot a nonsense because you didn’t simply say he’s not the best (and in that case you’re right), but that Hanneman is better, who by the way also plays with a pick. I believe you that he plays fast!!!!

Oh bisius, what useless comparisons you make! I would have understood if you had said that Flea is inferior compared to Pastorius, Geddy Lee, or someone else, but the bassist of Slayer... well! Moreover, he’s barely heard on the album, so by what standard are you saying that Hanneman is better than Flea? Have you ever really listened to Flea? Have you truly ever listened to this album? Have you ever really listened to the Red Hot Chili Peppers of the '80s? Or do you only know "Californication" and the last two albums? In my opinion, when it comes to the old Red Hot, you know the usual hits like "Under the Bridge" and "Give It Away"! Great review and welcome to Debaser, Fippo!

children of the damned, well, you may be biased, but I voted 3 for the review because I found it original. Of course, knowing it’s copied, I’ll give it a solid 1.
A piece of advice for the editors: those who copy reviews, in my opinion, want to mess with us and debaser, ban them so they can’t register again and we can avoid useless reviews like this one.
Anyway, I’ll say it again "the number of the beast" great album, but less spontaneous, with more fillers and inferior to both the previous and the subsequent albums. I definitely prefer powerslave and especially seventh son of a seventh son, the masterpiece of Iron with Dickinson on vocals!

I partially agree with what you say; however, instead of saying it’s pathetic and disgusting, you could have articulated your opinion better. Nonetheless, the review is well-written. I agree that I find this album a clear step backward compared to the previous two. It loses freshness and spontaneity. We can say that it loses the heavy rock and almost punk energy of the early days to create more constructed compositions. It’s a transitional album, but not as bad as you describe. For example, the title track is, in my opinion, one of the best songs on the album, with a great riff (among their best). You also can't dismantle "Run to the Hills" like that; whether you like it or not, it’s the prototype of the Iron Maiden gallop. For the rest, I more or less agree with you (although I would also save "The Prisoner," which has a lovely melody). I round it off because it’s a historic album. 4-

Come on, it's funny, just make sure your next reviews won't all be in Romanesque. Original!

Great review! Well done!

More than brilliant, Anathema know which intimate strings to touch! Their albums are capable of evoking emotions and delving deep, perhaps brilliance in this sense, not in the meaning of a band mastering and inventing a genre!

great review!