Senmayan

The last film I watched was "Quando arrivano le ragazze," if I'm not mistaken, and I found it to be very good: friendship, love, and jazz. I don't see him as a director who has reached his peak or is finished, especially since he is one of the few in Italy who still challenges himself with different genres (see his return to horror with his penultimate film). I haven't seen this film, but Avati is generally a very personal director, far from the usual clichés of Italian films in recent years that simply deal with midlife crises or offer cheap dramas or sentimental comedies (the various Ozpetek, Muccino, and company).

You never engage in reasoning about the content, do you? The usual excuse of "I don't discuss with people like you"? I calmly highlighted an ascertainable fact (I can give you the example of the Italian historian Franco Cardini, a medieval historian, or the former German minister Von Bulow, or several engineers and physicists who might not give a damn about history, all with a non-conspiratorial view of history) and you talk about provocation... the paranoid and the people you mention do exist, but you're generalizing a bit too much, and that nonetheless doesn’t discredit a thesis. It's like saying that those who don’t believe the official version of Ustica are conspiracy theorists. Can’t everyone have their own opinions without being labeled a conspiracy theorist?

Look, you’re generalizing a bit too much; there are many people, scholars, and historians who, while they don’t believe in the official version of September 11, do not subscribe to a conspiracy theory version of events. The issues are not connected; this seems like a fairly simple concept to grasp. Good night!

it's not my case, it's just that your categorization is very simplistic, and I could do the same in your case, but categorizations never fully reflect reality. Good night, and I hope this ends here. Bye!

Yes, really enough, we both exaggerate by dragging this discussion on indefinitely. Our positions are irreconcilable and there is no interest in reconciling them. Good night!

At least you play your cards on the table. When you say to me, "I know your ideas very well," you almost make it seem like you know me. This isn't paranoia; it's just that you throw out a phrase and leave it ambiguous, forcing me to interpret it (which has made this discussion stretch on indefinitely): I am not a conspiracy theorist at all! What does that even mean? Conspiracy theorists are those who create conspiracies, and history is full of them (even the French Revolution was a conspiracy by the revolutionaries against the nobility). For me, the official version of 9/11 is false, and saying something like that doesn’t make me a conspiracy theorist—it simply means I have a different opinion, and in my view, the evidence surrounding this issue is overwhelming. You don't see it that way; you live your life better, what can I say? You, on the other hand, are one of those typical people who support every official thesis, thinking that everything is transparent and presented on TV or in newspapers. Even in people like you, I see uniformity and naivety in believing official narratives just because the Bush government and the official commission said things went that way. Have I been too superficial in judging you? Well, you have been superficial too by calling me a conspiracy theorist.

Moreover, we are writing in real-time, so it's normal that I don't respond immediately to some of your posts!

Look, I've never had such a disturbing discussion on the internet. Let's forget it because you're really exaggerating, creating more tension. "I know your ideas very well and I could say a lot of things..." But what are you saying? Do you realize the serious implication you're hinting at, as if I were some kind of dangerous person? Do you get it?

you don't know my ideas at all cptgaio, I've never talked about them on debaser, if you spy on other sites you might know a little something...