Fidia

I reiterate, only the complaint by the injured party is needed to proceed. The validity of the complaint and, therefore, the existence of the elements of the crime is a task that falls to the judiciary, not, obviously, to the complainant. The judiciary, in the absence of the aforementioned elements, would proceed to the dismissal of the case.
Having given this little lesson on criminal procedure, I must say that, of course, everyone is free to have their own opinions on gays, and so on, but I repeat, I have read all the feedback and the nationalist references are abundantly clear, and the incitement to violence and discrimination (not only against gays but against ALL minorities) is, in my opinion, quite evident.

Essentially, that is, in the crime of incitement to racial hatred, penalized by a LAW of the Republic

My dear anonymous, as someone who is knowledgeable on the subject, I tell you that what you have written is correct, but you have omitted to mention that defamation, just like the crime referred to in the law I cited, is a crime that can be prosecuted upon the complaint of the injured party.
This means that if Berlusconi were to take notice of the writings in which he is referred to as a mafioso, he would have every right to report the authors to the Prosecutor's Office (or the Carabinieri).
Similarly, he could do the same against Vic, anyone who feels offended by his statements, which, I assure you, are not merely simple jokes, and he did not limit himself to mocking gays (I recall that, subtly yet firmly, he expressed support for a certain type of narrative against Jews, and in my opinion, if done with the tones used by the "reviewer," it fully falls within the crime I highlighted).

One last clarification for CycoCiccio: you wrote an inaccuracy. The Americans liberated us from Nazifascism, but the Bolsheviks somewhat removed themselves and somewhat the previous Pope took care of it.

Of course, I spare you the rest of the law. Vic, I tell you from the heart, be careful, you could get yourself into some serious trouble because of your need for the spotlight, and you might also give the De baser editorial team a hard time.

My dear Vic, thinking back on it with a cool head, it turns out that it was good for you (and also for the editorial team) that your proclamations were censored.
I did a quick search on the matter and found some interesting things:
DECRETO LEGGE 26/4/93 ° 122 CONVERTITO IN LEGGE 25 giugno 1993, n. 205
ARTICLE 3 OF LAW 13 OCTOBER 1975, N. 654, IS REPLACED BY THE FOLLOWING:
"ART. 3. - 1. UNLESS THE FACT CONSTITUTES A MORE SERIOUS OFFENSE, FOR THE PURPOSES OF IMPLEMENTING THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 4 OF THE CONVENTION, THE FOLLOWING IS PUNISHED WITH IMPRISONMENT FROM ONE TO FOUR YEARS:
A) ANYONE WHO DIFFUSES IN ANY WAY IDEAS BASED ON RACIAL OR ETHNIC SUPERIORITY OR HATRED;
B) ANYONE WHO, IN ANY WAY, INCITES DISCRIMINATION OR HATRED, OR INCITES TO COMMIT OR COMMITS VIOLENCE OR ACTS OF PROVOCATION TO VIOLENCE, FOR RACIAL, ETHNIC, NATIONAL OR RELIGIOUS REASONS.
2. THE PENALTY OF PARAGRAPH 1 IS INCREASED IF THE ACT IS COMMITTED BY MEANS OF THE PRESS OR BY OTHER MEANS OF PROPAGANDA, OR AT PUBLIC MEETINGS.
3. ANY ORGANIZATION, ASSOCIATION, MOVEMENT OR GROUP HAVING AS ONE OF ITS AIMS THE INCITEMENT TO DISCRIMINATION, HATRED OR VIOLENCE FOR RACIAL, ETHNIC, NATIONAL OR RELIGIOUS REASONS IS PROHIBITED. ANYONE WHO PARTICIPATES IN SUCH ORGANIZATIONS, ASSOCIATIONS, MOVEMENTS OR GROUPS, OR PROVIDES ASSISTANCE TO THEIR ACTIVITIES, IS PUNISHED, SOLELY FOR THE FACT OF PARTICIPATION OR ASSISTANCE, WITH IMPRISONMENT FROM ONE TO FIVE YEARS OR, IF THE ORGANIZATION, ASSOCIATION, MOVEMENT OR GROUP HAS AS ONE OF ITS AIMS THE INCITEMENT TO VIOLENCE, WITH IMPRISONMENT FROM TWO TO SEVEN YEARS. THE PENALTIES ARE INCREASED FOR THE LEADERS AND PROMOTERS OF SUCH ORGANIZATIONS, ASSOCIATIONS, MOVEMENTS OR GROUPS."

I agree with Emanuele, they could have saved us the last 3 albums.

In fact, if his considerations truly reflected his thoughts (I almost forgot, he has also praised Hamas and considers Fidel Castro the model head of state that everyone should look up to), this would only reveal his personality and his sick psyche.
P.S.: Regarding Hamas and Castro, of course, the discussion would be longer, but this is not the place to delve into it.

I'll provide a brief summary for those who haven't read the socio-historical-political considerations of the "reviewer": essentially, his thought is this: that a mustached Austrian did well in what he did to the Jews, that the sole function of the female gender is to stay at home to handle domestic duties and to bear children, that homosexuals are only worthy of being dragged behind cars through the streets (somewhat like what was done in the Middle Ages when alleged witches were taken to the stocks), and that minorities (in Western countries, since considering the whole, the real minorities are us) should be, let's say, ghettoized to be kept away from real white Aryan men like us. In my opinion, Vic has lost control of his toy this time, because if his aim was to provoke and make people laugh, he succeeded with me personally, but I must say that anyone who even slightly identifies with any of Vic's hilarious ramblings shows an abominable historical and social ignorance.

Premise: the review on Sabbath pissed me off. This one, at first glance, made me laugh a lot and from a musical standpoint, I mostly agree with your thoughts on Audioslave and RATM. As for the, let's say, social aspect of the discussion, well we need to clarify something. I believe that it's all a provocation and, in my opinion, it should be read a bit like watching the comedians on Zelig do caricatures of politicians. From this point of view, the review is truly hilarious, and you deserve a full 5. On the other hand, my dear Vic, you must consider that the internet is frequented by many kids who could potentially be negatively influenced by your philosophy, and this is undoubtedly dangerous, as it could affect, even in a minimal way, youngsters who haven't reached the necessary maturity, and for this aspect, you deserve a 1. The resulting score is the average.