DanteCruciani

It seems to me everything... for Arcuri let’s think about it if we don’t hire Costanzo’s husband...

serena big boobs ua ua ua!....suggestions? seriously speaking, why not, I think I would give the role of the one who agrees with the review (and with me and you and almost everyone) to the legendary Steve Buscemi or Samuel Jackson or Bill Murray or Robert Carlyle. They fit like a glove.....I would give the role of the one who is with Cravestman and co. to some loser like Ben Affleck or Luke Perry (who I like, just to be clear: who hasn't loved Beverly Hills?! ).........in the Italian context, I would spark a great debate between Mario Brega (RIP) and that idiot singer whose name I don't remember, "slightly" effeminate with black hair and a blonde tuft in front.

Excuse my ignorance, what is "sludge"?

...breathless...

pupo? no no, I was just thinking about actors, not big singers (among the great actors there's also Totti, right?!)...... ;)

Thank you! We had some truly exceptional discussions that were part ridiculous, part cultural, there's no denying it.....however, we must thank all the participants on this page. Your idea is really great, antò! Maybe we could write a nice screenplay: now we just need to find the right actors: throw out some names....

I don't review anything by U2? Damn, of course I don't! I see that besides the poorly made pop you also listen to poorly made "rock"... oh well... by the way, Anto, nice little story about the chin, ua ua ua!

Great!

Note: Alright Grosso! Anyway, I completely agree with both fusillo and stoopid regarding the various and even different opinions expressed: there's a bit of truth in what they both say... about my previous comment, perhaps I didn’t express myself very well: @ know-it-all: let’s say that writing a non-pop song can be done in a more direct way (there can definitely be a part of improvisation then recorded on the disc which, for heaven's sake, can be amazing; I could cite too many examples). I just say that creating something like the songs of the Beatles requires something more, perhaps because you need to refine and hone the edges aiming for perfection, without, however, starting from a great inspiration and, why not, improvisation: we are not facing a pure exercise of musical mannerism made at a desk. In short, a song like the oft-quoted "Yesterday" remains a gem that is perhaps even superior to Floydian or Velvettian masterpieces, and I say this with great difficulty. In short, we’re talking about concentrating melodies and emotions in just a few bars for a total of a couple of minutes, to create something of the highest value and timelessness (oh, "Us and Them" or "Sister Ray" is timeless too, eh!). I hope I’ve expressed everything fairly well: and I'm pushed by the fact that I am attached to the Beatles, as it applies to a bit of everyone, I believe...

Hey! Hey!.....a little calm down! I've just come back in front of my silicon-chip processor and suddenly I find a crazy line of comments (stuff that hadn't seen anything new since May except for the nonsense between me and the honorable antoniodeste, to whom I send a warm wave from behind my neck)....so I must thank the punctual Cravestman for truly kickstarting yet another delirium that has already filled the comments section of this review several times. So: 1. Larrok is right and I apologize, his criticism isn’t nitpicking but a rightful dispensing of culture. You know, that day I sat down with the DVD and paused it every second to jot down the text precisely (pure madness, right? but things have to be done properly, after all)....it must have slipped my mind, damn!
2. I support what Larrok said regarding the punctual Cravestman (in the sense that his watch is indeed punctual).
3. "...but talking about an artist just for...YES!..." ;)