Vinsex

Well, I agree with this, although not completely... because where the attack takes the form of a latent (if not outright) rebellion against the system, with the intention of simply enjoying the thrill of provocation (and not only that), I don't believe there is space for praise... However, if, far from wanting to necessarily emulate Marxist philosophy, one wants to insult (among other things) the political and entrepreneurial class, simply because they are egocentric and plutocratic, then I have no objections... But Vic's tone, despite its "genius" traits, sometimes conveys an excessive fanaticism that seems almost self-serving... thrown in there just to say "any publicity is good publicity"... well, then I find that tone a bit offensive to the sensitivity of the moderate reader... That's all... Then, the ideas and talent are certainly there... and in abundance... but with lapses in style that sometimes have a truly "contrite" flavor. That’s why a person like this can only generate feelings of love/hate... (I mean, they really want that...!)

Let it be clear, however... and I say this openly... if Vic Sorriso were less violent and less of an exhibitionist, and more objective, then perhaps his reviews would truly be appreciated for what they are: ferocious desecrations of a mind with "voracious" talent, and therefore entirely commendable (at least in a general sense...!)

Perhaps if things were actually as you say, I too would be the first to point out Fidia as a "virtual ticking time bomb"... however, from what little I’ve been able to gather, the relevant criminal discussion arose regarding the review of Vic SOrriso... well, to be frank, in the face of such violent, neo-Nazi, albeit fantastical, and excessively fanatical content, it is reasonable for those dealing with the law to wonder how far a person can express their ideas, and what limits should be in place... In any case, this is merely my impression, perfectly debatable and should be taken as such.

Hi Fidia... I had asked you a question about the review of Amorphis, maybe you missed it.. reply when you can! (I'm not voting because it's a band I'm not familiar with..)

errata corrige: I made a mistake

here you go!

I have to admit you're right... I was wrong... but now I know what "comprimario" or "coprimario" means... your mother explained it to me... it means "to share someone or something with someone else"...

Of course I was talking about the two guitar heroes of Ozzy...!!

Well... I'm glad you understood the meaning of the parallel with Vasco... (I was afraid of being lynched...!!!!) I'll definitely check out the site. As for me, I love them both... because although for reasons and melodies that are quite different, they both gave me great emotions..!!!!! Bye

..on living law, your censure finds me largely in agreement.. however, dear colleague, don't forget that the term Jurist also applies to a certain Calamadrei, Carnelutti, and Cordero... in short... there is the Pupo del foro di Canicattì and there is Ozzy della Consulta!! The argument may seem trivial, I know.. but after your (just) consideration, it needed to be clarified.. As for the musical discourse (which interests us here..)!!, I must object that the supposed "perfectionist" abandonment of Ozzy, if it left through the window, has come back, so to speak, through the front door with his solo career... changing the pieces, the quality has remained largely equivalent (if not even superior when I think of Diary of a Madman..9 thanks to the entry of a certain Randy Rhoads first and a certain Zakk Wylde later, to MASTER Iommi....