lux

A super big monkey with super boobs

3 full for a decent record, but I prefer In/Casino-Out.

It's not my favorite by Fugazi, but Facet Squared is a nice punch in the face.

Hallelujah

Scaruffi, like all humans endowed with decent intelligence and vast culture, alternates space bullshit with ideas that are definitely shareable. In the end, he certainly recognizes and appreciates the masterpieces of rock, but the problem is that he gets fooled by unbearable avant-garde nonsense and a certain professional mannerism, which has always been his Achilles' heel. On the other hand, it's practically impossible to disagree with everything he says; sooner or later, you converge with some of his ideas, just like with any other person.

Well, it would be madness if I subscribed to all 98764537292048547382029475689798784 comments and ratings from Scaruffi. I admit that since you became Neu!2, your freedom of thought has increased by 1.2%. Your background remains Piero, and I'm not the first to point that out to you. However, I get the impression that you only read Scaruffi's ratings, not his opinions, because nowhere does it say that for him, people like Rem and Guns'n'Roses are "geniuses" and "he adores them." Scaruffi gives 7.5/8 to records that are purely revival, composed by excellent craftsmen who are anything but "geniuses." I missed your speculation on Maiden, but see, that's not the point. There are another 9,000,000 of your ratings that correspond to the Scaruffi Style. And above all, your mental scheme of "anyone who gives this book less than 5 stars really doesn't understand anything" is abominable, immature, and shows inner frustration arising from your inability to explain certain of your (your??) ideas. So you exaggerate and distort your "opinions" in a childlike manner, resorting to childish dichotomies (I am good and listen to good stuff because Piero gives it an 8, those who don't think like me don't know good music and have never read Piero). In short, for you, Humanity is divided into: Piero and his groups / Those who don't know Piero and his groups. I'd be curious to know your age, how old are you? Usually, this attitude of yours is typical of the developmental age.

"History never matters" --- it's the first time Neu! tries to say something of his own, what happened? His comment number 14 is too strong: "Anyone who gives this book less than 5 stars really doesn't understand a damn thing." Oh, so if someone gives it 4 stars, they don't understand a damn thing? Coming from you, who is the clumsy synthesis of Scaruffi... The funny thing is that you do nothing to prove that you are a parrot without a soul. For years, you've limited yourself to giving ratings with stereotypical comments like: "." - "Masterpiece" - "absolute masterpiece" - "How can you not give 5 stars to this work" - "..." - "a solid five" and so on. You, on the other hand, would be the one who really understands, right? If you want to keep clogging Deb with your standardized and pre-set SMS, go ahead, but don't drag in other users who give different ratings from yours and then offend them.

It's the first book that came to my mind to review. To define it is to limit it.

"Modern Music"? Well, at least it doesn't lack a sense of humor.

I haven't listened to him in ages.