geenoo Banned

DeRank : 3,10
DeAge™ : 7509 days • Here since 19 november 2005
Matteo Garrone Gomorra
Voto:
And rereading... Naples and the camorra are the same thing.
Well... a nice reading of your city.
Naples = camorra.
But do they come to you spontaneously or do you think about it?
Matteo Garrone Gomorra
Voto:
Finished the topics?
Matteo Garrone Gomorra
Voto:
Dalì... I understand that reading may not be your strong suit, but at least read the comments here before making a fool of yourself... here’s what AlessioIride wrote, copied and pasted, you know! "tell me why a Milanese (just any random one) should understand Naples and the Camorra, which are basically the same thing, better than me who just needs to step out of my house to see it." What do you think, does it need interpretation or is the literal meaning enough?
Dalì, read, read, and read again. It makes you more aware.
And write in Italian when addressing my Person.
Matteo Garrone Gomorra
Voto:
AlessioIride... now you're asking too much! I'm not obligated to tell you the premises, you just have to take my word for it. Anyway, aside from the premises, do you know that things are learned from books (and other sources) as well as from direct experience? You would want to tell me that you know the Camorra just by stepping outside your house? As soon as you open the door, is the Camorra right there on the sidewalk waiting for you? What does it look like?
Matteo Garrone Gomorra
Voto:
Ah ah ah Dalì, did he say it all? Of course, right, he's practically right because he repeated your words? What "clever" guys you are. Are you perhaps trying to pull a fast one on me with your dialectics? :-D
Matteo Garrone Gomorra
Voto:
AlessioIRIDE, either you carefully reread what I’m writing to you, or I won’t respond anymore. You keep drawing conclusions without even knowing the premises.
Matteo Garrone Gomorra
Voto:
M. Poletti, your response shows how ignorance reigns supreme in Italy. Do we only know the way we take from home to work and back? What are we living for? Let's shake things up.
Matteo Garrone Gomorra
Voto:
There is no need to live in Naples to understand the Camorra, I reiterate.
Just living in Italy is enough.
Matteo Garrone Gomorra
Voto:
AlessioIRIDE and Dalì... I smile. Do you know why? Have you realized that you've drawn conclusions without having the premises? Let me translate: what do you know about where I live, who I am, what I do? Then, why is it that when someone talks about a problem that has always been vast and boundless (camorra, mafia, 'ndrangheta et similia), which has transcended national borders for decades, someone gets upset and says: but what do you know? I live it, I know! But what do you have to do with it (generic you)? I'm talking about the problem brought up by the review, expanding the discussion on a certain type of culture that you should have and which only a few possess, and here some of you get angry asking this nonsensical question: yes, but I know better, I live it! But what does that have to do with it?????? You may know better the direct impact of this system, you'll experience the violence and daily distortions firsthand... etc., but, I repeat, what does that have to do with understanding the problem of camorra, business, etc.? Either you're a magistrate or you're a camorrista, or... what do you know more? But I want to reiterate that your observation of "but what are you telling me? We live it" is absolutely out of place and incoherent. Greetings.
Matteo Garrone Gomorra
Voto:
Yes, but... what does that have to do with it?
Do I have to live in something to know it?
Emotionalism, getting carried away, and the typically Italian way of being emotional are one thing; knowing, understanding, comprehending, and discussing on objective bases is another.
Can I only understand something by being immersed in it? Perhaps, if anything, the opposite is true.
But what does this mean? That I can't talk about it because I don't understand it since I don't live in it?
Do you realize this?
The only thing I may have been misunderstood about is the implied hypothesis that the reviewer was poorly educated. My discourse is general and should not be referred to the reviewer.