geenoo Banned

The game is getting tough.

Tomorrow will be in my room.

You know Enbar77, my grandfather was a partisan, one of those who fought in the Apennines. One of the tough ones. I also think of the fascists-nazis identifying them as "bad" during World War II. But that hammer and sickle in that gloomy atmosphere does not reassure me at all. It's a gut feeling. In short, it doesn't make me feel safe. I'm talking about that context, okay. Very interesting the work done with the Ante-Photoshop by the photographers back then. And then they come to bother us photographers (I'm just a Sunday photographer) when we push the envelope a bit with the photos using software...

I love it when there's de-amore in the air... As for my tits... Regarding Bartle "1) geenoo hasn't been on the staff for years;" A year before you, but that doesn't matter much. As for Bartle in relation to me: I have to say, publicly, that he thinks so highly of me that every time he comes to bother me in private about whether to do this or that... I haven't said anything until now, but in this context, it seems right to come out. As for the girls on this site: Long live women!

Enbarr77, of course, you have nothing to do with it. I love the photo, and I like your review that expands on it. A small consideration of mine: I would have preferred this review—sincere as it is particular (like a thousand others here on Deb)—on the home page instead of the obvious mockery of the statue of Arnolfo di Cambio that is instead featured here. In my opinion, the editor should be good at sniffing out nonsense, the kind that hides the stink under a fragrant crust, but if you look closely, they always have the shape of a turd. The comments above were just those that catch the clueless: you know, the viscous and, at first glance, sweet ones? And indeed: Stinger-Bender-Nicola Laiosa-Tettedimariae-C'è.

The comm. 40 is a quote. As for the fakes that are reproducing at the speed of mosquitoes in the pond: you will never have my scalp! And now I'm going to the sea.

I don't believe that Mr. Enbar or anyone else in his position should get angry. Personally, I think that criticism should come from the entire site, in a structural and determined manner. You say that this section of the site is not a pillory: that’s a misjudgment, and let me explain why. Speaking of literary cases undermines the value and the effort that a deRecensore puts into submitting a piece of writing. The fact that they are non-canonical and that they bring out their knowledge and feelings is something extremely positive and must be valued as such. After all, many pages contain personalistic messages or vulgar phrases (I'm thinking of Mr. Puntinicazpuntini's review of "Maledetti" by Area; if you don't recall it, I invite you to take a look) and yet they have been included in the home page, in addition to the fact that we have seen incredible reviews, something with content that's unbelievable and, I would add, mind-bending. With the concept of "literary cases," a bubble of discredit is created, a serious judgment is made against the message contained and against those who have expressed it with passion; it is a moral and psychological pillory. It constitutes psychological violence, as if I were to say "that person over there is crazy" and justify this by saying "I even gave space to him," and yet the judgment and the human discrimination have already been perpetuated. I prefer strong comparisons: placing a review in the literary cases is like sticking a symbol on the body (you might be aware of the yellow stars of Hitler's memory). Moreover, defining "literary cases" as resources of the site is utterly nonsensical, and I have two reasons to support my thesis. The first is that the link to the "cases" is tiny, the second is that these reviews do not appear in the author's list. It constitutes a throwaway, not a valorization. Allow me to end with a personal question: do you adhere to the finiana current? I await your response and send you my best regards.

Uh-oh, I hadn't noticed the chiccha: "but how did you end up on this site?!?" :-) Now enough laughing: I support Kosmo in his struggle. We'll see each other in the Chamber. We have no intention of leaving the party we co-founded.

I assert my right and that of anyone else who frequents these pages to speak about whatever I like and to participate in discussions that I deem worthy of my intervention without having to ask for your permission or anyone else's.

Nicola, you’re not going to act offended, are you? On Debaser, unfortunately for you, being offended and pretending to be is prohibited. Regarding what I wrote yesterday, I stand by it. Who told you that my comments aren’t useful? Trust me, they are useful.