Sanjuro

I would sell my ass to NOT write Teen Spirit and In Bloom; I'm not a musician, but I would do better gargling with tantum verde than with the stale, monotonous repetition of their rock formulas from 20 years ago.

I reversed the votes.

I reversed the votes.

Everything is very beautiful and exciting, but Nirvana's music is: stupidly repetitive to the core. Just listen to Rape Me and Smells Like Teen Spirit, identical riffs, identical structure. I'm not saying that Nirvana didn't know how to play like everyone else (because I really don't care; I'm not a clueless Dream Theater fan): they didn't know how to innovate. So Cobain wakes up at 11 in the morning, grabs his guitar and thinks, "Today I'll create a melodic intro, sing over it with a pained voice, then there's the chorus where I scream, then the verse is the same as before, and I’ll do the pained melody again, then there's the chorus and I scream, and then the solo mirrors the main riff of the song but in a rougher and distorted way. Chorus End song." Cobain had these thoughts for years, and as sincere as he might have been (but then again, he was one who signed with Geffen and ran around saying stuff like "Multinationals and major labels are crap, they're awful," bla bla bla bla. Meanwhile, he's the fool who lost all artistic freedom outside the grunge mold by signing with GEFFEN and condemning himself to a teenage mythical figure). It's like saying that being religious and going to church is for stupid fools and then finding oneself on their knees every Sunday enduring ultra-boring sermons from super mega pretentious priests. Nirvana is limited; Cobain doesn't step outside the song format, he self-clones repeatedly and uses patterns so repetitive that they make your balls ache on your knees. Cobain's best ideas in the early days were abruptly abandoned: Hairspray Queen with its awkward dance, the muffled bass and random screams. Or Big Long Now, a sort of heroin-infused singer-songwriter ballad. Aside from Bleach and the B-side of Incesticide, Nirvana doesn't hold up. There are a thousand more interesting, intelligent bands. It's not hard to reign supreme on MTV. Cobain challenges the Butthole Surfers, the Jesus Lizard, Fugazi, Flipper, Slint, Pere Ubu. Compared to all these names, they are simply a concentration of banality and nauseating nonsense. Cobain himself said that their band, compared to so many others, was dry shit. Rightly so.

I like Red Medicine more than Repeater...@_@ It seems superior to me.

I understood why Vikernes did it anyway: going to jail in Norway is like having a fucking free room at the Holiday Inn. They let you do whatever the fuck you want, the cells have all the comforts, free food and lodging, and everything else... so much so that Count Sarcazzisgnackh, whatever the fuck his name is, kept recording shitty albums even while wearing the black and white striped jumpsuit, forza juve. Let’s be clear: he never had that desire to work. Grandissimi momenti metal pt. 3 - Google Gruppi

The goal of those who started playing black metal in Norway was another: to scare normal people and to take over the minds of the pathetic, pimpled teens that make up the fauna of their fans. Philosophically, Norwegian black metal works like this: "Norway is the fucking most boring shithole in the world, what do we do to make it all more exciting? Let’s start killing random people; that way, we’ll create some folklore around it all." ... This brilliant writing is by someone banned from this site. AND I LOVE HIS GENIUS!!! It’s absolutely unique, a pure, unblemished genius. Grandissimi momenti metal pt. 3 - Google Gruppi

I'm sorry if I made a mistake by not adding the S of editorS. Why don't you think about your mother who has made far more serious mistakes? A bag of limp dicks that you are.

But was it really so hard for you dear editors to create two sections: one "Professional Debaser" and the other "Debaser free from a more academic form"? Instead, right away you label others as "Literary Cases" "Human Cases," immediately showing off, pretending to lean left. Why am I number 7 among the human cases? Because I said there's no difference between a utopian leftist idiot supporting Prodi and a right-wing one supporting Berlusconi? Because I said that art must emancipate itself from the social to reach its acmé? Because I expressed a negative opinion, among other things also with articulated and documented irony, on the Beatles and Pink Floyd? The real human cases are you editors.

Have I changed? No, no, I told myself "I have changed," and I meant that even at your mother's house while that bull of your father was out working the streets. You know, violent sex...