zuckina

But then, do you need to be more humble in life if you want to get somewhere? But where is it that you want to get to? I don't understand. Fortunately, I am cold and technical, and you speak like a cliché on two legs!

my tone is more cautious because it’s evening now and in the evening I’m more relaxed. If you wanted to suggest that your words made me lower my guard, you are very far from reality. And anyway, I don’t have a guard; I have a buzz cut!

perhaps you don’t believe I could know those words because you don’t know them... I’ve met many like you, who think that everyone else who doesn’t conform to their standards of ignorance are either frauds or full of themselves. I feel sorry for you, but culture does exist.

Well, the meaning of your words won’t change, but you remain anonymous and therefore cowardly. I am not, and I take both insults and praise. I haven’t read Claudio's other reviews; this one is really poorly done, and since I know the album, I said so. That's it. When I read his other reviews, I might change my mind about his skill, but anyway, I judged this review, not his life. What’s strange about words like "sessions," "suite," and "reunion"? It’s natural that I know them if I know the world of music, but it's also natural that I have read books to understand the history and events of Pink Floyd and the impact of their albums in history. I don’t copy.
For Nash: I don’t feel humiliated because the review is and remains poorly done for those who know the Floyd. Does he know more about life than I do? Who cares, and anyway, who can say? I’m here to talk about music, reviews, and reviewers; you’re talking about philosophy. Okay. Anyway, I criticize and let myself be criticized, I discuss and chat, and I like it that way. If you have problems, that’s your issue. Bye, little beasts.

But I said what a nice discussion this is... I wasn't being ironic! I like it... I guess the drugs work, but you just can't understand me precisely because of that. Too cerebral? It depends on what you mean by cerebral, because if you think like for GAY, I wouldn't know what to say. I can't discuss with you if you use terms that only you adopt. Anyway, what's wrong with saying THE DRUGS DON'T WORK? Besides being homophobic, do you also hate those who don't use drugs to understand cerebral music? But what kind of music is it if you have to listen to it high and it encourages you to get even more high? Note that I'm not against drugs, I don't use them, and I don't feel inferior to anyone because of that... but not superior either. And frankly, any Pink Floyd fan would tell you that that psychedelic phase was just a chapter in the Pink Floyd career. Barrett is gone and goodbye psychedelia. Anyway, I have fun, really, I like the discussion. It's entertaining. However, Antonino never seems to understand anything, does he? Also read the other comments, little one, otherwise you won't grasp the discussion. Bye and see you next time.

heron, you caught me. It's true. Anyway, I sent the message because the pointless comment got on my nerves, not so much the vote. I like clarity. Anyway, I'm not going to take it so hard anymore. That time I had the know-it-all monkey on my back.

the drugs don't work... bread sausage and horned rye... it can be done... what a blast this discussion is...

x Antonino: I’ve written reviews too. There are 4. x puntiniCAZpuntini: gay doesn't mean different. It means cheerful, festive, playful, carefree, lively. Or it can mean dissolute, indulgent, licentious, immoral. Or homosexual. Or drunk, wasted. Gay doesn’t mean different. So explain to me what the hell I said to get on your nerves. Maybe the grave sin of disagreeing with you? I’m sorry. It didn’t seem to me that I expressed ideas so repulsive as to not deserve to write on this site. I’m really mortified. By the way, I find you really likable. That’s all.