psychopompe

DeRank : 13,33
DeAge™ : 8186 days • Here since 11 january 2004
Sextrash Sexual Carnage
Voto:
Fuck, I want to see what face Osvaldo "pussy breaker" Scheitze had!
Sextrash Sexual Carnage
Voto:
Ah Fallen, it’s been eons since I last saw you around here. Welcome back.
Sextrash Sexual Carnage
Voto:
I’ve read it too, and I can say that if you wrote it with the final part of the duodenum and you’re around 14 years old, maybe we won’t stone you; otherwise...
Love Forever Changes
Voto:
sorry simplicity doesn't work, some might interpret it as a flaw, I don't know maybe a strong pop appeal is better
Love Forever Changes
Voto:
I was listening to it again, and in my opinion, it transcends all genres a bit; mainly because there's very little that is fundamentally psychedelic, but I tend to categorize it as psychedelia. Discussing it with a friend made me realize how it's not a given that everyone will like it; in fact, he found it quite unpalatable. It reminded me how different sensitivities can be from one listener to another. It's a natural thing, but I tend to forget it from time to time. I wouldn't call it pandering, more because that has a strictly negative connotation; I'd say it's an album with a marked pop simplicity. Like some of the Beatles' stuff, just to dot the i's and cross the t's. With the necessary geographical and cultural distinctions.
Zeigenbock Kopf Fuck You To Dust
Voto:
I care about my anal virginity, so I think I'll leave the record to you tough guys, but the review, Nino, is as genius as always! Write more, we need it!
Hideaki Anno Neon Genesis Evangelion (The end of evangelion)
Voto:
I look at the third to last one too, what could be so fundamental to refute what I write? That is to say, that the Lilim are humans and not demons? That Anno invented the figure of the Lilim and then brainwashed all the Jews on the globe? Well, sometimes I don't understand you. What 47 writes may be superficial (I also say that new wave sucks, but who has listened to all the related records), but absurdly, over time, it also has a true basis. Not in terms of the quality and the target of anime (there are stupid things, and excellent strictly adult works), but in terms of the followers of animation, those who defend every new production tooth and nail, as if criticizing animation is in turn a criticism of their myth of Japan. I've known characters like these at university, they were my peers who were the first to have a serious offer of manga and anime, let's say starting from '92/'93. The typical monomaniacs (thanks to them I also stopped buying manga, and frankly, I don't miss them) unfortunately exist in every area of pop culture that gradually transitions from niche to more famous. What saddens me is that a lot of the current character design has become dramatically flattened and homogenized (in this, unfortunately, Evangelion has done a lot of damage, precisely because of overexposure). The '70s and '80s had designers with incredibly diverse styles; Arale didn’t look like Mazinger, who didn’t look like Uruseiyatsura.
Hideaki Anno Neon Genesis Evangelion (The end of evangelion)
Voto:
wake up you: Lilin - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia as far as Wikipedia can be considered reliable (I had read some articles about Judaism to inform myself). The interesting thing was that humans became, in a game of mirrors, precisely the demons, which is why the Angels came to destroy them. In fact, you missed one of the focal points of the dystopia in Evangelion.
AA.VV. Blow Up presenta ROCK e altre Contaminazioni
Voto:
I got it on Saturday, I'm reading it but I already have some serious doubts. First of all, given some choices that are clearly against the trend (nothing wrong, I also prefer Led Zeppelin 3 among the first four) and courageous, it would have been appreciated to have an introduction like Scaruffi's in HIS history of rock, meaning ONE history of rock, that is, a personal vision. Putting that fundamental on the cover makes me uncertain. Anyway, there’s a lot of great stuff, especially in the avant-garde that I will look for, given my ignorance. The problem is that it doesn’t seem to be well written so far; I mean, I’ve read maybe 5 issues of Blow Up since it started, but I don’t recall a writing level this flat, some parts seem written by 15-year-olds. And then that guy, Zingales, on the other hand, often overdoes it, coming off as heavy-handed. And then damn, there are even some mistakes, like the review of the Hawkwind, which is acceptable for crying out loud, but since this book was supposed to be the summation of their view of music, it seems a bit thrown together. Oh, I might change my mind, I’ve only read about thirty entries and many of the choices I agree with (especially the one for Funhouse, finally someone who writes about it). But for instance, I liked the approach of the one from Mucchio more (which I think is also written very, very well), but it didn’t really risk anything (it’s impossible that Dylan has valid albums over almost four decades!) and said little that was new. We’ll see, we’ll see.
Hideaki Anno Neon Genesis Evangelion (The end of evangelion)
Voto:
Come on, who the hell is Longhino??? It's Longino, damn it, even the stones know that!
Tags 3/3
# #1 #4