Galakordi Urtis Krat

comment #17 to be framed. to be transformed into an editorial. to be sent and printed in all newspapers. to be read in schools. GUSTAVOLAMAZZA president and honorary principal of all municipalities and all schools in Italy. sacred words, to be written on tablets of stone with lightning. great.

my 1 doesn't go to the reviewed book but to the author. it's hard to believe the words of someone who in just two and a half minutes of "Comizi D'Amore" (Pasolini) shows all her immense, infinite fluffiness.

It's always easy to define new bands of the 2000s as New Something. In reality, they're never really new at all. In fact, it's these groups that you should be skeptical of and instead dig into things that might be less hyped but are much, much more deserving. There are a ton of things in metal; it's one of the richest and most multifaceted genres out there. But it's also one where you can find the most atrocious crap and plenty of disappointments from misplaced expectations. Yet despite everything, despite hundreds and hundreds of crappy bands popping up every ten seconds, it still endures. If there's one expression that can work with this genre, it's "long live metal / down with metalheads."

great RATMAN

Haneke is one of those who has never missed a shot. I mean, have you ever seen "71 Fragments of a Chronology of Chance"?

aaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!! point 10 of this decalogue cannot be readdddddd!!!!!!!!

YOSIF president

PIOL, come on... you know where... idiot

hahahahahaha!

Well, I haven't read your entire review either, but I stopped at point one of your decalogue. Assuming, for the sake of argument, that you are NOT a fake but a fourteen-year-old girl studying at a gymnasium and blah blah blah, you should at least have the honesty not so much to admit your shortcomings regarding your understanding of the subject you are reviewing (yes, this is already something too paradoxical), but rather to AVOID reviewing things that are so immense and that you clearly CANNOT understand (like this book, like millions of other books and films, like life itself, which is not the little comedy à la Frank Capra that you describe in the last line of the first paragraph of your review). In Nietzsche, throughout Nietzsche and exponentially in Thus Spoke Zarathustra, there is metaphor, there is poetry, and there is a knowledge of the world, of life and the mechanics of the world and life, and of thought, and the spirits of all peoples, which are the result of studies and an extraordinary sensitivity. Extraordinary for a German (Nietzsche greatly criticized his contemporary Germans) and for a man of his time, so much so that he was effectively ahead of at least a century compared to his peers, while being a profound connoisseur and lover of classical culture. I’ll conclude with a quote from him that seems obligatory in this case, and I dedicate it to you entirely. "No one can derive from things, including books, more than what they already know. For what one has not experienced, one has no ears." P.S.: never do it AGAIN!