Galakordi Urtis Krat

A thank you to rocknrollsuicide for the video they linked.

hahahaha! Really amusing review. I haven't seen it, but it’s basically as if I had.

other arms and other lips, sorry

other arms ripped from the honest world of porn

I'm sorry, I also believe that Mellon Collie is a masterpiece, but you can't write "Billy Corgan is perhaps the most sensitive artist that exists right now in our musical landscape" in 2007, on the brink of 2008. The whole review, despite good intentions, boils down to a ridiculous anachronism.

amarok74, finding one is not impossible and not even "almost" impossible. The meaning is actually quite clear.

in the sense that it is obvious that it is, and it is clear as day.

Mulholland D. is pure psychology. Every single element combines to create a practically perfect human and mental picture. Personally, I think that to say "the meaning in this film exists" is equivalent to calling a work that is a rare Masterpiece stupid. But truly rare.

great review indeed, congratulations

Poletti, I didn't direct the comment just at you, but more generally towards those who were saying the things I precisely reported in that comment you referred to. Nothing personal in any case, as it's a criticism that is definitely more general than personal. @Muffin: perhaps here we enter a discussion linked to aesthetic categories and the perception and appreciation of certain nuances by individual viewers. I know well what you described ("loving an author doesn't mean accepting everything they do") because many people, both "amateur" viewers and also many individuals who deal with cinema a bit more specifically, fall into this sort of emotional trap. For my part, I too tend to mythologize certain authors, even if I try to justify this fetishism with the artistic and communicative merits of the adored subjects. This is the case with Lars Von Trier, for example, whom I ABSOLUTELY ADORE, but whom I have criticized heavily after watching Manderlay, which I considered an absolutely inadequate and extremely silly and hasty film. Yet in the cinema, there were people smiling smugly at the von Trier clichés or at certain things that seemed like nonsense to me. The audience is the audience. In fact, perhaps the audience is public, and as such it is varied and fundamentally chaotic (in the sense of random) and unclassifiable.