frasco

So, I would like to say another thing: someone here said "listen to what you like." Well done, but it's a shame that you hear Vasco Rossi everywhere, and those who don’t want to hear him can’t avoid it (this just shows how much Vasco is advertised!).
As confirmation of this statement is the comment from all the people who commented before me about something they wouldn’t have wanted to hear. According to Silver, how come Giorrrrgio is here passionately stating his opinion hoping that people try to understand without having ever experienced real music? It’s unclear if you don't try, and you shouldn't talk, rather you should listen if you don’t know. This should be made clear from the outset. Life itself positions this as a principle; clearly, some don’t grasp it because it doesn’t suit them to understand it, as it might cause them too much mental turmoil (for example, realizing that what they have understood in thirty years was nothing but nonsense), but I don't want to delve into complicated psychological matters that, while I would enjoy discussing, should be done with the right people and especially face to face (it takes less time to make a point).
What I mean is: the car commercials, the videos on MTV 12 times a day, and even a degree is a huge (and to think that I have to pay a lot of money to go to university and slave away like crazy while this guy almost can’t talk and they give it to him just because he's famous! And he's famous thanks to others!!!) don’t tell me that it’s not monstrous propaganda. Vasco isn't famous because he’s good or deserves it or because he’s a great artist, but because the media (even on the news!!!!!) makes us believe it. There are those who believe it because they lack an understanding of what true music is to compare and evaluate the validity of the statement, and then there are those who say, "What nonsense!" because they have a true and right idea of what music and art are.
Yes, yes. MTV. I’ve noticed that people know music through MTV. Some get tired after a while and start searching for music on their own, while others continue to think that the best music is showcased on MTV. But these are absolute fools: MTV doesn’t play music, it shows videos! Videos that are, moreover, PROMOTIONS for the album to listen to, certainly not the album itself where there should be artistic music. And now I want to ask you some questions that you (or MTV's minions) have never asked yourselves, otherwise, you wouldn’t keep watching it. And if a song is too long to make a video (because it would be extremely costly), what do you do? And what if you don’t have money to make a video? Or, as in the case mentioned before, in the case of a group from the Congo that has the economic and physical ability to make a video, what good is it if no one sees it? What utility would that have? We then realize that the videos on MTV are not true music, true art; they are merely advertisements (keeping in mind that there might be better products than those advertised), and furthermore, we wonder why the music that "goes the most" is the one with tits and asses everywhere? The same goes for the nightclub, where almost no one goes for the music (despite being called a "disco-teca," where they should play "discs" of "music") while the rest of the people fill the place because there are hot girls and because others are going? Yet nightclub music is art? Yes, the earliest songs, but not 20 years of absurd monotony of "tum-tum": the artistic concept that was supposed to be expressed has already been stated! But returning to music videos, there are awards for the best videos, and who receives them? The band! But... what the hell! Aren’t they the ones making the video? They make the music! And yet, they receive the award for the video!!! And how does their success come because they won the award? Immense! And does this make them artists?
NO WAY, EXCLAMATION POINT!
I would be very curious to hear other opinions, but I would prefe