Massimof

Gambling. Jessica Simpson? Sticking to this review, the broth is souring in my stomach.

This is a great artist.

But no, Eneuccio. Actually, yesterday I ate heavily and drank some cheap wine. Today I'm feeling much better. Is there any day when you'd want to bite the first person you cross paths with, has that ever happened? The first one who messes up and... zap! Lightning! Roast! Not today. I also enjoyed rereading the good intentions of our Francis, who has started studying law, which never hurts. "Those fucking Lynyrd Skynyrd....." Instead, the bands you listen to are choirs of angels. But today is a "yes" day. A day when even Francis deserves respect... especially since his next review "will be about a tremendous artist criminally overlooked by Debaser... I don't know when it will be ready, but I've already seen that it will be one of the most difficult I've written here." So let's leave him alone. He's working for us. P.S.: RingoStarfish, was I good? I followed your wise advice. Of course, when you review an album, you should review an album, not curse or get close to it, but it is what it is. But today I'm peaceful. I had a very light broth. However, now that I think about it... you gave it a 4, Ringo? ... No, no, it's fine. Everything's good. Relax.

Alexander77, come on. Ciellino. Let's leave the labels aside. Write, argue, get angry, insult, or do whatever you want, but just drop the labels. It’s like me telling you: DonAbbondio (oh yes... Francis is in poor taste, but so is Massimof, that ciellino...). You need balls for this. Instead, I stand firm on my opinion about Francis (this afternoon he started studying the penal code... ahahahahah). In fact, I’m more interested in the posts of those who give him a 5. This Saturday afternoon is going to be a real laugh.

"Before putting in the ellipsis, I feel the need to ask you a question: in art (and thus in music), can one hate God but at the same time want to f*ck Him?… … … … … And is it better to reign in hell or to be a slave in heaven?" I just regret that the editor who read - and approved - this "stuff" also wanted to publish it. It's interesting that, for example, forums or posts cannot be used (as stated on this site) to attack other users, otherwise they will be deleted. Meanwhile, this "stuff" can float freely on this site. In my opinion, it's a shame that results in the site's discredit. Moreover, there’s also a specific article in the penal code, 724 to be precise, which I believe is widely violated by the aforementioned phrase. I think there’s a limit to everything. Especially to certain fake rebellions from immature idiots.

Why try to "cultivate" or "elevate" something that, by its nature, simply wants to be entertainment? Anyway, I believe your biggest mistake is bringing up such grandiose names for comparison. And then this album, from what other points of view, if not the (well, yes) musical one, could be "very interesting"?

One of Young's masterpieces. And this album is seminal (for many grunge acts to follow).

Perfect explanation that leads us to say that pop(ular) can also be synonymous with very high quality.

Mmmmmm KosmoG... I read in your post a certain allergy to "enormous popular success." Even MTV... be gone! ;-) Just think, (you probably know very well) that The Dark Side of the Moon by Pink Floyd is one of the albums that has stayed the longest on the American sales charts. But... can it be considered "pop"?

Mmmmmm KosmoG... I read in your post a certain allergy to "enormous popular success." Even MTV... be gone! ;-) Just think, (you probably know very well) that The Dark Side of the Moon by Pink Floyd is one of the albums that has stayed the longest on the American sales charts. But... can it be considered "pop"?