Voto:
Well, itās been a while since I avoided commenting on Battle's pages; I had already bothered him enough about some of his pages written by scattering words randomly, and it's been a while since I've checked DeB, but given the latest about M.B.V., I wanted to take a look and Iām astounded⦠I see a vast majority of high ratings, many 5s: but doesnāt the use of this poor language, already battered by time and rampant sloppiness, seem like a fundamental element in judging a text? And if so, how the hell can you not realize that, despite some slight improvements, almost no sentence, maybe even no phrase, starting from the opening, in this "review," makes any recognizable sense, at least according to what we thought Italian was until now? But if that werenāt enough, shall we talk about the "content"? Does anyone really think that this stuff is worthy of even a meager passing grade? What the hell is written, what does it say about the group, about the album, about the period, that makes even a minimum of sense? The issue is that itās true that on DeB thereās such a variety of "styles" and approaches to the subject that anything seems acceptable, but one thing is to choose to proceed with images, evocations, stories, or para/poetic hermeticisms, and thatās fine, everyone is free (and everyone will reap what they sow), another is to attempt a "historical" and "stylistic" analysis of an album. In that case, you either do it properly, first measuring yourself against your syntactical abilities, your vocabulary, then you try to articulate an analysis that has relevance to the subject youāre tackling, identifying its characteristics, perhaps approaching it from a personal perspective, but arguing, illustrating the aspects you find peculiar, establishing connections between the elements that compose it and placing it, for example, in relation to other works or to the context in which it appears. And on DeB there are many pages done like this, some, furthermore, written very well, which, since they are the work of less "popular" users, receive lukewarm readings and even cooler acclaim, because, perhaps, they are dedicated to works less "cool" than these M.B.V. Was there really a need for this banal little page, after nine others, for this album? And it even gets a 5? Damn, you have low standards. - I donāt dispute the sincere passion of Battlegods, which drives his hyperproductivity (and since all the "cool" albums are already reviewed, the need to write duplicates) nor can I avoid noting his absolute impermeability to criticism (he always responds, but almost never to the point, not because heās being clever, I really think he just doesnāt understand it) but Iām astounded by the uncritical and positive response that certain pages receive. I had promised him I wouldnāt bother him on one of his pages anymore and I held on for dozens of "reviews," but I believe itās clear that, having lost hope with him, this long rant is aimed more at the readers than the "reviewer": encouraging, with applause, such a mediocre and unshaken practice seems detrimental to me. Amen.