odradek

"...wonderfully to wonder.." It seems they were pleasing to her, the two. But tell me: to follow all the uncontrollable productions of that madman, did you take out a mortgage? Wouldn't you have the authority, dear Sfascia, to rein in the frantic Zorn, perhaps tying him for a while to some wrecked vehicle awaiting crushing, so that we could, little by little, in the meantime, recover the lost CDs, "catch up," so to speak? - Another question: why not give a tiny fragment to DePopolo? - Samples Campaign 2006 - Piano-violin and angelic greetings. Antzichenò

I have never loved them much, this is my favorite album of theirs, a solid 3.5 let's say. I'm always a bit surprised by the heterogeneity of their audience... I differentiate between opinions and perspectives, which are always debatable, and the quality of the review. Which is once again high. Mooooolto above the average level, even though curiously more "canonical."

Welcomed with a certain skepticism due to its unusual mixture, I liked it. Among the many manipulations and alterations of ancient "untouchable" materials, this one has its own dignity and an unexpected reason for being. Women singing Palestrina? Perhaps not the most canonical way to approach it, but precisely for this reason, one of the most accessible for those who generally indulge in other listens. The cover is beautiful too.

Symbad, what can I say? Cheers.

Mhh... it seems to aim at being conclusive, the long analysis by Renzo Pin regarding more than one issue raised in the conversation. I don’t think it has been, but it adds more fuel to the fire. Too much for my limited capabilities. However, hyperboles or not, I don’t think that opening a dictionary resolves the matter. I imagine Pin doesn’t think so either, but I believe I’ve understood the intent. The fact remains that often, reading his pages in here, I admire the ability to propose an angle of view that allows one to observe the object from otherwise improbable perspectives. By virtue of a knowledge of the "subject" that seems broad and "serious," referring to his words related to commitment. And to do so with an accuracy and a style that speak of his understanding of things in a more definitive way than the lines above seem to intend. I simply hope to have more opportunities to read him. Comparing his representation with what I see from my narrow point of view. It doesn’t seem like a small thing to me. After all, it is the best one can hope for in a place like this. - Regards to Ascanio, from whom I await news on the direction his work is taking.

Yes, the grades...

Welcome back, 69. You show up rarely, but always with perfect reviews! (I still can’t get over the handful of comments on that one about the Buzzcocks) A longtime fan of yours.

:) Yes, I think the gray comment above has interpreted the situation well. No, for heaven's sake, burns. Go ahead.

Yeah, okay, maybe we can talk about it elsewhere. For once, let's limit the comments to the content of the review. Just here, does that bother you? Thanks.

Salieri, that editor's choice is old. I think when they update it, there will be a spot for this one. Personally, I have "invited" some users who hadn't read it to check it out (both privately, via email, and in the comments on my last rec). If I'm wrong and it doesn’t appear among the Editor's C., I will be astonished as well. But I don't think that's going to happen.