odradek

@ zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz: oh my god, what a shame...(what is Under the Jaguar Sun?) - @ Sfascia: look, for the editorial we can manage with the old one, the one about cattle. It seems like it fits well today. Early morning greetings to josa (and to Josi, if he stops by here)

@ Stronko: it doesn't matter whether they are more or less skilled. - This place is a space where everything is published, where an impressive amount of words is spent every day, overflowing with vulgarities and insults, often with the sole intent of being noticed, where four kids who should dedicate more time and effort to studying ramble on about freedom and "sellouts" and various nonsense, supported by a guy who claims to be older and who for a long time has done a pathetic job of proselytizing (remember?) but who is still here today, making snarky comments. But it's also a place, fortunately, where many people share interests and curiosities about music and exchange them through pages that are more or less "nice." I write about things that have impressed me, for some reason, and gather information and suggestions for purchases and listening. The rest really doesn’t interest me much. And when I can, I avoid it. When I can, indeed.

Aren't you being foolish? 10 euros for every 5 pages? Do you think that's funny? Well, then it’s true, it’s a matter of looking good at all costs but probably not for me. This record deserves to be listened to, especially by many young people who are just now discovering things they’ll hardly ever get a chance to hear, and this one in particular is quite unknown. That’s the reason. And since one page is exclusively a flashback, the other says something more about the record. And everyone is free not to read even a line of either. - If you think this means wanting to appear, then do the math on your journey here, without making too many excuses, and then we’ll talk about it again. But look who’s talking.

I have it, on vinyl. If no one has stolen it.... I found them very likable. And I see that when they are mentioned, 6+9=69 shows up again. How are you? Where have you been, when will we get a review from you? - Anyway, it's not just a less approximate technique to distinguish them, but it's really the more (forgive me the term) pop attitude. By the way, I highly recommend the review of 69. Regards.

SAMPLES IN BOTH REVIEWS, ALL DIFFERENT. ENJOY BIPARTISAN LISTENING.

P.S. - BOTH PAGES CONTAIN SAMPLES, ALL DIFFERENT.

@Ajeje: in this case, my vote goes to the memory, the attitude, the uniqueness, and the anticipation of world music. I'm not attracted to charts, but considering the reevaluation of some junk on the DeB pages, even these days, let's say that if those are collecting so many 4s or 5s, this one would deserve a 10. The former is perhaps also "more beautiful" but it's really hard to choose. - @Stronko: well, if I were doing this for the money, I would definitely do it differently and certainly not for 10 euros, not even per page. But as I might have already told you, I refused to do it many years ago and much less would I do it today. Alright, this time I won't get offended, okay? Regards.

Biminkia! (it's a double, isn't it?)

A very beautiful album (I really liked these Mercury Rev), a wonderful cover. I mentioned it a couple of days ago in a comment and today here’s the review. Can I make any more wishes? :)))

Metallà, this was scarce. It’s not the helmet that awakens, but Italy. Which has crowned its head with the helmet (of Scipio). You messed up. Damn you...