odradek

Sure, happy that we’ve reached some understanding. Have a nice day, Marì.

@nick65: ??

Darling, I have no intention of changing anything at all, not at all. It was merely an observation regarding your writing. Spontaneity (since you use the comparison with painting and since I started painting about thirty years ago, I refer back to that) finds an ally in technique: if you are able to master the instrument (the colors, the mark, the space), it will be easier to create something that adheres more closely to what you have in mind, or in your heart, if you prefer. It's the same with words. Then if you believe that it’s fine as it is, that this is your definitive and unchangeable way, and that it is not possible to modify anything, attempting to refine your "style" and master it ever better, good for you. I, on the contrary, feel exactly the opposite: for me, almost more important than the result is the doing, the work on the doing. And I never settle. Even if those who settle, they say, enjoy. Little, but they enjoy. Some find pleasure instead in the very search for pleasure. Strange creatures, humans, right? I confirm: I’m not trying to change you. It’s just a conversation, relax. We’re just people reading and writing, and it’s not always possible to say everything, explain everything, understand each other perfectly. Greetings from the unpleasant odradek.

Damn, G__á, was the old Gil there too? That's a guy I would have really liked to meet. I only have the stories from friends who worked with him on some record projects. He deserves a worthy page in DeB. - As for the album, which I got as soon as it was released, I remember the elegance and richness of the sounds, some very successful tracks, and an overall great impression – I believe the best from Sting as a solo artist. But he never manages to get a 5 from me. Grass, however, does, I believe always.

I agree with Kosmo. The best of Mariaelena. But she should find some form of agreement with the Italian language. I often have the impression, reading the obvious "poetic" attempt, of an unintentional "surreal" treatment of the same:) - Coincidentally, the passages that Socrates prefers are also the ones I remember as the best. However, I only have 1 vinyl and 1 cd...

Incredible: an entire sentence that Punisher had posted doesn't appear, and I had tried to include it in the comment above. Probably because it's a rare example of extremely positive judgment :)

Because among the latest comments I read that Punisher's is: "FA- VO-LO-SA... I can't find any other words in current Italian to say it!!!!!!" while here only exclamation marks appear? Mysteries of the occult.

Sorry, condorbars, for expressing myself even though I'm not directly involved (I'm not an editor). Since I don't know and don't care to judge the criteria that assign one page to the right and another to the left, I read them anyway, wherever they are. What's the problem? And I don't judge them scornfully based on the number of words. However, this is a personal way, certainly not the only one, to interpret the whole matter. But the question is: why, if I click on your nick, do I read: "...we have never received reviews from the same email used for registration_"? What pleasure is there in constantly expressing one's little judgments, the evaluations of others' work, the opinions of others, without putting oneself at stake by trying to express one's own, through the medium shared by everyone here, a review? This is not a rhetorical question. Free to not answer, of course.

metropolitan areas. - P.S. Non-transferable is written in front, but keep it, that latecomer.

Mhhh... at least the food warmer, is that transferable? Alright, fine. The correct answer is: cbdgddasa k<cjbds. But I will donate the substantial cash prize to the funding of the Salentization project for the Milan subways. P.S. The Gragnano pasta has nothing to do with it, it’s the sum that makes the total. What? Oh, yes, that's true. Forget I said anything.