odradek

I mean, Pippo, did you think I chose the fonts? And maybe the new (briìutta) graphic design of the site?

Great discozzzzzzzzzzzzo, but "My Sister The Sacred Cow" by the Nostalgic Debasers was a thousand times better :)))

Vortex, read in the box on the right: Sophia on DeBaser with 9 reviews (9, I say, not one or two) Maybe we’ve already given enough (like the Sophias, after all) But I've noticed little attention is paid to the fact that the site has an enormous archive. When one comes across an excess of pages dedicated to the usual suspects, a jump into the archive can be useful to discover hundreds of lesser-known things. - For this, a rating between 3.5 and 4.

And every time, if you don’t like it, someone says that we need to get used to it, that it’s just because it’s new… but it’s really ugly. All this black, like in the plumber’s flyers made at the copy shop. And the disappearance of the Sacred DeMucca. They’ve already taken away the mid-seasons, and now even the crouching bovine. Easy for you super-young folks, always eager for novelty. But do you ever think about middle age? Bad!

Well, rather than a music of the future, it's one of the musics of the present. And it seems very aware of its own transience...

The more I read these so-called "reviews," the more I think that the "cinema" section is a great opportunity for anyone to commit an act of violence against cinema (a phenomenon more prevalent than in the music section, also due to the "intellectual" intentions sparked by the subject matter in the "reviewers"). In some cases, even the poor Italian language suffers (but that's nothing new). In remarkable cases like this one, there's even a refined dialogue between the reviewer and those who comment. Great moments. - As for Haneke, I prefer his other works. I'll rewatch this one one of these evenings (3.5/4).

@TheRealRamona: they were anarchists, they flew far away (and those who remained can only be found if you venture in - @Sfascia: the den is always tight, but there's room for these post-its. - @Josi: I cleared you in the small area. Did you note it? - @Fest: de nada. If I think of something else, I’ll throw it your way.

Same as Trellheim. Will I provide? - Curious this blend of names: actor Perkins decides to name his son Elvis, and considering that Carl Perkins has never received the posthumous attention he deserves precisely because of the popularity of "The Pelvis," now the two names "miraculously" coexist in him.... - Always beautiful descriptions, Vì

I subscribe Hal. Dear Vera, since everyone decides for themselves, I allow myself to invite you to a greater attitude of interaction in this space. I have rarely seen you on other people's pages, perhaps only once, upon invitation. Is it possible that nothing evokes the slightest interest or a simple comment from you? Yes, of course, it is possible. Strange, unless the music exists exclusively within the circle you frequent. So it is also possible that this comment sounds inappropriate. In that case, please disregard it (if you have even graced it with a glance). I also apologize for the absence of a vote, which would certainly be positive, but I have not been giving them for some time regarding the little pages. Always devoted.

Well, if "content" (not exactly immune from political and ethical considerations) is a constitutive element of "form" or product (this is the more appropriate term, let's set aside the pointless attempt to define a vague term like "art"), as it also makes use of Nazi and pro-Nazi material, it seems to be understood that the "artist" exploits that, separating, even in a state of transfer (but why do you keep doing this, dear Memento?), the two things is not only an incorrect operation (subjective and baseless in reference to facts) but risks being misunderstood, where it would like to express itself in terms of clarity. In short, given a careful reading of your own words, it is impossible to release the post you hoped for, Mementomori. To me, it's more honest to tell you that the entire framework that should support your page is filled with inconsistencies and that what I feel, in light of certain productions, like the one you describe, is disgust. Because I believe that things do not exist in a distant empyrean but live in the concreteness of their time, these, like other "artistic" manifestations, are situated, in fact, in a degraded cultural climate where everyone seems to have the right to deny the undeniable and propose the unproposable. And recent chronicles testify to that. That said, I will try to listen to this stuff and understand where you found art (just pronouncing that word gives me hives). Reading what you say, it seems to me to be crap. Not even fresh, by the way.