odradek

As an old moonshiner, I can't help but favor "Moonshine," from '73, featuring comrades like Danny Thompson and Tony Visconti. Perhaps his most complete, mature work that showcases great skills in composition and arrangement.

In any case, Sire @[lector] is, as always, right.

I will never see it, and it’s not about scornful prejudice, it’s a recognition of a fact.

I remember an interview during which he took off his shoes, I believe even his socks, stating that only barefoot could one continue, or something like that. Well, that interview, if I come across it, I willingly watch again.

P.S.
I have to, with some regret, lean towards the blond this time. Messer 123 (by the way, I should suggest it to the Sovereign @[lector] : it would be nice if the Capishoni called each other with a lovely "Messer"), if you find yourself compelled (urged?) to indicate, twice in the comments, that it’s “sordociechi,” the elegant ellipsis appears empty, at least in part.
In large part, we would say, if it weren’t for the fact that some of the assertions that describe it are undoubtedly revealing of your knowledge and judgment regarding the director, and, in some way, also enlightening about the meaning of the film (by the way, is it a film or is the medium digital?)

Moreover, this understandable reluctance in the use of stars, I think in some cases, should be compensated by a less elliptical tendency that allows for a bold, monetizable judgment, in short, understandable even to those accustomed to vulgar internet parameters (which any Capishon obviously can’t stand).

On the other hand, the refusal to numerically assess a work, in such a DeContext, seems to me should, to a certain extent, translate into an even more apparent intelligibility, in the text, regarding the relative value of the album, film, book in question, according to the author of the page, also in relation to the overall production of the musician, writer, director in question.

Of course, these are entirely extemporaneous considerations, following the good-natured rebuke of the lovely @[Eneathedevil], which I could disavow at any moment, should you wish it.

I take the liberty of notifying His Sovereign @[lector] about Mr. Masturbatio as the new Capishione, even just based on the present text - I downloaded the album and I understand even better what you meant.
P.S. That was me on the balcony.

No one should take offense, but it had been a while since I read such density and at the same time lightness here on DeB.

Well, this coincidence of dates is truly amazing. I didn't even know about his disappearance.

"He's a real jerk, unpleasant, but somewhat talented." It's not mine, but the guy who told me is reliable, and whenever I come across Branca (who I haven't listened to in ages), it always comes to mind and makes me smile.

Sorry, is there a function that allows you to remove the notification for new posts from a specific page? @[G] if so, thanks (if only I knew how) if not, I hope there will be one.

@[aleradio] Which movies did you like afterwards?

Seen in the theater at its release, revisited years ago, I wouldn't proceed to a further view to verify in detail what, tortuously, the page expresses in terms of "reading," even "socio-political." What remains is the appreciable taste of an inescapable sense of ending that emanates from Spacey's figure, the disintegration of a world, especially an inner one. And a series of contrivances, all quite functional to the subject, which force an excess of suspension of disbelief. This fact, in general, from my point of view, affects the perception and evaluation of a film.

I ingested Bergman from the second half of the '70s to the early '80s, I should revisit it all, not just the "classics."
And it's true, from what I remember, this deserves a dusting off.

@[JOHNDOE] Can you explain to me, you who are one of the many (almost all, in fact, even on TV, newspapers and online) to use the singular form of the term "pregnant" even when the noun is plural, why do you do it?