odradek

Yes, beautiful. Thank you, Super.

MIEN_MO_MAN, with every post things get worse, the show you offer is more and more degraded. Do yourself a favor: be quiet.

MIEN_MO_MAN, I see you agitated and a bit disconnected, both in logic and eloquence. But I really don't feel like giving you my attention; let's say that His Holiness tonight blesses you with affectionate understanding and dedicates himself to more worthy pursuits. But if you insist on this tone and seek satisfaction, one day he will return and give you what you're looking for. P.S. His Holiness hasn't complained, he pointed it out to you. It is you who is lamenting, and you've provided yet another demonstration of it. Goodnight, my son.

Hi, blonde. It's really a tough time, but I trust that sooner or later we'll meet, climbing up and down hierarchical ladders. A kiss.

Here are Zap Mama, Lukin. There's DePosta for you. CiaU

This album surprised even me (who has never been as enthusiastic about the lady as you seem to be). It’s not bad at all, even though I haven’t listened to it again since then. You’re right to highlight the excellent choice of musicians, as your drummer friend is somewhat right: the fact is that she brought another "intention" to it, quite atypical in reggae albums, and it’s precisely the combination of her interpretation and the sounds she moves within that makes it such an interesting record. Thanks for digging it up, I’ll revisit it one of these evenings too... -

I am really curious to see it, especially because I really like Jenkins, who I believe has never had such a great opportunity to showcase a talent that has emerged on many occasions in the role of a "character actor" or in secondary roles. Your page seems effective to me; how "on point" it is will be revealed when I watch the film. Thank you.

Pleasant reading, a bit overblown and manichean ("for everyone else, there's always 'Chinese Democracy': but maybe not) but what matters is that now I have to seek it out and listen to it (if not exactly "feel" it) this album. Thank you.

"If Picasso had his blue period, then all other artists are allowed to do anything": NO. For two reasons, first of all, and for several others, secondly. But the first is so obvious that it seems self-evident: Picasso was Picasso, and HE could afford it. The second is equally obvious, provided that barbarism has not reached a level that nullifies any reasonable difference and that with the abused term "artist" one can refer both to one of the most important painters in the history of art and to a young lady who sings little songs (even pleasant ones, sometimes) just to propose an opening like this. No editorial intervention would have saved it from its glaring absurdity, which I believe is far more serious than a little more or less bold text. The rest of the review is quite agreeable, as is the rating for the album (3-), which I remember as nice but a bit uncertain.

You know