odradek

One might think that you can't read, but I'd rather choose the hypothesis that I'm the one who can't write. Alright, I'm turning this thing off and saying goodbye. Bye.

Boh, Punisher, I certainly wasn't under any illusion that you were on point, you must have suction cups instead of hands, you're always climbing up the walls. You seem like my nephew, but he shows greater clarity in his responses. What the hell does the documentation regarding what you write (inaccuracies copied from a sheet, plus your approximation in the associations) have to do with the fact that you've dumped a lot of garbage in here? Just because you didn’t only do that, can we not say so? Or to say it, do we need to have read every single one of your pages? Come on, at least don’t insist. It would have been easier to do the math and discover that someone born in '72 wouldn’t be 23 in 2005 and say, yeah, I didn’t bother to find out who he was and what he had done before, etc. No, you can't even admit the obvious; you have to try to counter it. And don’t bring up "the rushed judgment nonsense": there's nothing rushed about your behavior in here. I’ve had years to evaluate it and unfortunately, you keep confirming it: I’m not referring to the person but to the user and their contributions, just to be clear. But anyway, since we're at it, I hope you aren’t so petty as to deny that I (and a few others) rejected the slaughter game when the pathetic story of dichotomy and compulsive dissociation that featured you came out. So if there's anyone who can talk about an escalation of disappointment, I believe it’s me; I thought it might serve you well, but I see you’re repeating the same mechanisms, even in the face of evidence it's better to deny than to admit calmly. Happy for you...

Just finished the first listen: well, it’s a really nice album. Arrigrazie.

Thank you for the suggestion, it's one of those titles I had promised myself to watch and then... your lovely post brought it back to my mind and now I'm looking for it.

It’s quite surprising, after tons of trash detailed in the DeB, to find a small page about Punisher on a worthy product. Too bad this one is brief and poorly documented. Meanwhile, the director at the time of the film was 33 years old and not 23, as mistakenly indicated with an exclamation mark. Almost as if it were a discovery by the reviewer, who assures us "that it will cause quite a stir": Anders Thomas Jensen was on his third film as a director after working on the screenplay for some of the Dogma series, and the film plays with the dogmas and their deconstruction, sarcastic and paradoxical, which is light-years away from the quoted Tarantino and incomparable to Kieslowski, unless addressing religious themes is enough to bring together two authors absolutely at opposite ends. Paying more attention to the subject of one’s little pages, perhaps even making the small effort to get a bit informed before writing, would also be a form of respect, what a shame. - As far as I know, unfortunately, no other films have been released in his name, and that's a pity because he seems capable of interpreting the logic of Dogma in a wholly personal and very enjoyable way. A solid 7.5, based on the memory of a few years ago.

Thank you, THEJARGONKING, it works! I didn't know about one of their deaths, I was hoping for a new album...

I see they're releasing for Cuneiform, and from what you say, they seem in line with the great productions of that historic label. But I couldn't find anything online... do you happen to have a link? - P.S. Speaking of Cuneiform, a record came to my mind that I think you might like. Here you can read an old page of mine where you'll also find about ten samples Zaar - Zaar - Recensione di odradek

Hi Rocky.

I see that at least, even if you won’t admit it, you’re not trying as usual to deny the obvious. Here, maybe do a little crack before you write, who knows, you might start getting some right. Ah, I won’t reply anymore, I’ve exhausted my “lost time Punisher” bonus for this year. Take care.

"The review, however, didn't sit well with me due to a certain condescension towards the band in general." It's clear and indisputable that the term "condescension" refers to the tone used towards the T.D. and has nothing to do with ratings or assessments of the album in question. It's evident to anyone who can read, and for those who struggle or are blinded by an excessive and unfounded confidence in their own discernment abilities and an equally unfounded and arrogant distrust of others, for those individuals, it's further clarified by referencing the blatant dating error of a cited work. Now, Mr. Punisher, wouldn't it be better to read and understand before responding sharply with vulgar exclamations and a flurry of exclamation marks? - P.S. Why am I intruding into a review that I care little or nothing about (more nothing than little, in fact)? I don't know, I read the latest comments and Punisher's reply, then I read the review to understand how his interlocutor PI-Airot could have misinterpreted Punisher's thoughts to the extent of deserving a response, and I discovered that the one who didn't even grasp the question was precisely him, the great Punisher. It bothered me a bit, so I sat down to write this comment. Which is also too long. Regards.