Alexander77

Don't worry, I'll take my leave and promise not to bother her again, especially since I don't find anything interesting in exchanging a few words with her... now I'm going to educate myself about Hollywood. Enjoy the rest of your day.

Giola, first of all, try to use another tone... get yourself together and say it to the person who spends the days next to you... it's already the second time you've used this lovely tone... since either you're a hypocrite or you're clueless, I invite you to reread your posts or those of Panzone (whom I have nothing against)... but it’s useless anyway, as if you would admit to being the usual arrogant one who wants to impose her thoughts on others ("your comment shows that you really know very little about Hollywood in those years" this is what you wrote... I wrote "Excuse me a moment... I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt, but as much as the review is really well-written and heartfelt, I just can't see in that photo the portrait of a woman in a moment of fragility")... See, I have no latency, I tell you to your face what I think, but it would just take reading the posts.

The annoying thing is that those who want to see in us "Fragility, instability, sadness. Infantilism, naivety, innocence" want to impose their thoughts on those who, in this photo, see a professional being photographed by a hyper-professional photographer: but at least go look at the other photos from the shoot before you speak... then let's see if this photo isn’t the usual pose of a goddess, with a coy finger, full lips, and a falsely innocent gaze... as for the rest, I won’t even comment anymore; everyone can think as they prefer...

Ah, is it every man for himself?! Are we throwing fish in each other's faces? I'll bring the little fish!

The booklet...don't underestimate the booklet! :)

Thanks to Gino for the note! We'll sleep more peacefully! :)

One last thing. "Ambition and egocentrism are basic qualities for breaking through in Hollywood": yes, and so? I was pointing out the difference between the word whore (which sounds bad, and has a derogatory meaning) and the word arriviste, which has a similarly negative connotation but is presented in a more elegant way...

Yes, you’re rambling about nothing. "Excuse me for a moment...I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt, but as well-written and heartfelt as the review is, I really can’t see in that photo the portrait of a woman in a moment of fragility." As you can see, I’m not expecting anything...you come in and write "Your comment shows that you really know little about Hollywood in those years," and I pointed out that, in my opinion, from what you write, you know little about MM. You can, I can’t?! For the rest, I actually agreed that comment 1 might seem out of place and rude...you’ve made it a biblical issue...ah, I don’t know who K had a problem with, but that poor thing could have spared herself, since she pays attention to words...bye bye...

Alright K...you know, one could debate for hours about the weight of a word...but "arrivista" isn't a nice word anyway...and the meaning isn't too far off from that of a person who has sold out for success (and perhaps their true self, the fragile one that many talk about...always because I give myself the benefit of the doubt)...