Alexander77

DeRank : 3,38
DeAge™ : 7705 days • Here since 7 may 2005
Nirvana Nevermind
Voto:
one does not exclude the other, I see no reason for it, especially when the good in both is ready
Nirvana Nevermind
Voto:
Ah, then there would also be the Melvins...
Nirvana Nevermind
Voto:
sang
Nirvana Nevermind
Voto:
Thank you, Don, it's mutual... anyway, don't forget the inspirators of Nirvana, and especially Mudhoney, who were the first to play in a certain way in the underground scene of Seattle... I can agree with you about Alice, but the problem is that Alice has always played what they wanted; they've gone from glam to metal to grunge (which doesn't mean a damn thing) to acoustic... and they are infinitely superior musicians to Nirvana... and Layne sings like Kurt could only dream at night.
Nirvana Nevermind
Voto:
if this deserves 4 dirt what does it deserve? 10? and badmotorfinger? or superunknown?
Nirvana Nevermind
Voto:
what the hell is historical importance? if the zit-faced kids needed Nirvana to realize that AiC and Soundgarden existed, that’s their problem!
Nirvana Nevermind
Voto:
stinger go listen to wasted time before speaking
Nirvana Nevermind
Voto:
it's a piece of shit disc
Nirvana Nevermind
Voto:
The funny thing is that there's someone trying to push a distorted pop song like In Bloom as a great song... or even Polly, which is a pathetic lullaby... or worse, Lithium... three is already too many, let's make it two.
Nirvana Nevermind
Voto:
the rest is incompetence