Eneathedevil

Let's play the three-card monte!

Ahhhhh, great, I'm more knowledgeable about football!

Friend Joe, I checked: in the last 6 months (I won’t go beyond because I’m lazy) more than fifteen editors overall have written a total of 11 reviews for an average of just over half a review each, and it’s tough luck for the fascist and black editors (and a bit gay too, but that’s a point of pride!) who are just playing their own tune.

Well, what do you want, it was that jerk who asked for the deletion of all his good reviews. Today the convent offers this excellent plate of lentils! And you can't say no! But how faded you are and mammapuzzapapà, right? Do you want to argue the reasons why the review is poor? WE WANT ARGUMENTS! What is the lip service?

There’s the note on the editors, now that’s life! Wow! Apolide, let me correct you! The only thing I took advantage of (a little smack on my left cheek, just once) is the enlarged font (Sfasciapizzoccheri, then we’ll go off and I’ll tell you these morbid secrets!)... oh, poor me! I played and sang my own tune. I hadn’t written reviews for two and a half months, and overall in the last 5 months I’ve written a total of 2… what a rascal, if I may say so, at least on my part. Then, my goodness, forgive me, but you didn’t understand an iota of the situation, or at least you’re contradicting yourself. We let Enrybaxx slip away and the editors are singing and playing their tune? No, quite the opposite. Enry has always been at the top of the list of the most advertised users by the editors, always featured in EC and rightly so. He, on the other hand, has snubbed the system and scolded the editors harshly for being exposed in Editor's Choice. Then without any overt aggression, he left over a trivial matter that certainly involved no personal offense or raised suspicions of favoritism in opinions such that one could say the editors were "singing and playing" (sic!)… a Greek tragedy in the following review where he grotesquely and offensively portrayed two users of the site, only to attract sarcastic comments from many. But by then the damage was done, and how the editors fit into that, who knows. So at least in this episode there is no connection. If you mention others, we’ll discuss! But we want named incidents, don’t sulk now. LET’S GO LET’S GO!

Anyway, the controversy is currently as pointless as my patched-up ex-sex worker cat! COME ON, COME ON, brutal critique, no minkiatelle!

Did you see? The new page setting for submitting reviews has the default option "Do not allow anonymous comments"... but not for me! I wouldn’t miss out on a healthy anonymous debate for anything in the world (and I mean it!). Stateless friend, listen to me, I disagree! First of all, what on earth does the cover art have to do with this: I intentionally chose the one for Tonto Rides Again, the compilation: I think it's more fruitful for the discussion also because, I don’t know if you’ve noticed, the title of the album in the review is "Tonto rides again," not "Zero Time"! So please allow me, you are inattentive, and you deserve a little ear tug. Then you dig into my painful past and I’ll tell you: it’s not true that I ever got "excellent." I never did. Then in high school, things went better, but back in the days of letter grades, I never achieved the highest honors. A strict professor, thinking back, but I indeed didn’t write very well. Over time, I have refined myself. Regarding music, Psycho was a treasure and I take his words to heart. On musical matters, I add, I still feel quite unprepared, but in time we will become little women, you, me, Beth, and Meg, and there will be time to learn. Bye, kisses!

Well, after this long discussion, at least I discovered a new insult: 71!

I don't understand! Are you sure about being gay or an atheist? I'm not ready to be an atheist.

One of esteem!