Eneathedevil

The editor should reply to you about this; in the beginning, I noticed that the reviews I sent were published after a while, then the times were reduced to 1-2 days, possibly by chance. Anyway, someone will surely give you a more comprehensive answer :)

Ah, true... therefore A-J-E... and then "je" repeats the same!

But Ajeje is the one from Aldo Giovanni and Giacomo?

I would say, even though Zion is certainly more experienced in longevity :-O

it can work

Thank you so much, editor. I wanted to ask for it, but I thought you wouldn’t do it... thank you, faster than a Ferrari mechanic :)

See, Hal??? This is proof that you don't read my reviews carefully :)

Damn, Grass, you're right and I whip myself... unfortunately, I'm terribly distracted, and don't worry because I'll say a lot more nonsense, we're just getting started! Anyway, you were very attentive in reading the review, well done... even Hal didn't notice it :) I take my fault, unfortunately sometimes in the so complex world of classical music one can get confused for a moment; of course, the K550 is obviously by Mozart.

I agree, but you still can't understand that you can't put yourself in a position to salt in the air when reading provocative comments. It's useless; they will always be there, you know that well, and you can't avoid them. The demonstration of style can't consist of doubling down in a forum where you show you’re not "above," as VV says. I've been here relatively recently, and I know well that there’s systematically some idiot who gives me a low score on my review more than once and then runs away without revealing themselves as if they felt clever for doing a disservice to Lupin. There are those who insult, those who tell me to fuck off. Sure, maybe I’ve received fewer insults than yours, but when that happens, I couldn't care less. In fact, I play into the hands of others by sending affectionate little kisses. This is the logic, you haven't accepted it, and I'm pleased that with this review, you leave Debaser definitively, as already stated.

So, Francis, the problem is that I believe you haven't fully grasped the underlying logic of Debaser, which is precisely the uncontrolled freedom to write whatever one wants. Thus, when you find yourself writing reviews that, for one reason or another, may provoke various impressions due to their eccentric charge, you cannot demand that certain enthusiasts - and non-en enthusiasts of the genre - express all their dissent in tones that are not Oxfordian. Of course, they are to be blamed, but you cannot expect the world to be democratically filled with refined people who respond "I disagree, tivibì nonetheless" to any alleged nonsense. Therefore, assuming you will not change your tone, the only thing left to do, in my opinion, is for you to take your leave and stop sending reviews here on Debaser. The wave of polemics you're provoking, given that you don't accept negative comments, does not do you honor if you truly have the dignity of a reviewer and journalist. So, put yourself in a position to think that Deb doesn't deserve you, just as Deb has come to believe you don't deserve it. This is the only solution; continuing to scatter insults even in forums does credit to no one, least of all to you: maybe you are right, but by reasoning through insults you are losing face more than any anonymous idiot who has no face when commenting and telling you to fuck off.