Eneathedevil

DeRank : 18,21
DeAge™ : 7756 days • Here since 18 march 2005
AA.VV. Barry Lyndon
Voto:
Yes, the death by horse is a pretty common cliché. The one with tuberculosis is similar: the blood spat on the handkerchief is quite striking. I would add and emphasize again that in the review I don't think there are too many tragic references.
AA.VV. Barry Lyndon
Voto:
Uhm, I don't know, I don't really agree. You demonize the system too much. A Clockwork Orange is a film pushed to the point of paradox; it's obvious that the monster is the society that sweeps away the devilish dust it creates itself, but Alex, Giordyboy, and their friends are violent monsters that the system generates, and beware, the system feeds off them. So it's a bit like the game of a dog chasing its own tail; there isn't a clear distinction between good and evil.
AA.VV. Barry Lyndon
Voto:
Kubric reminds me more of the famous cube, KubricK the director :) To err is human...
AA.VV. Barry Lyndon
Voto:
Caz, I see you holding back with me, and I don't know, it scares me... never a fuck you, never a 1 star review, I don't know, I feel mistreated... "I think you only grasped the surface of this film without understanding its meaning"... what disgusting nonsense are you saying... normally you would have written "You didn't understand a damn thing, stuck-up prick"... but no! Tragedy is the film to the extent that it's dramatic, anyway, but mine is just a provocation because I admit that this film, tied to a vision from too long ago, I barely remember, I have a dark painting in mind considering it relates to a time when I wasn't interested in Kubrick and cinema. So frankly, I’m fine with what you say and I'm very sure that you have much more certainty and knowledge regarding this. As soon as I have the chance, I'll watch it again, I promise. Anyway, you digressed, in my opinion you didn’t remember Candy Candy and thought it was simply a bouquet of tenderness and sweet loves. But no, you should have said: "It seems like the review on Dolceluna," which was bullshit, not Candy Candy. Moreover, in the review, there are no clearly defined references to any supposed tragedy. Poor Candy.
AA.VV. Barry Lyndon
Voto:
Yes, master
AA.VV. Barry Lyndon
Voto:
I had edited your post a bit also because there were accents on "sta" and "sto"... bleah. But you really messed up on one thing. I remember Candy Candy very well; it was full of incest, dead parents, dead boyfriends, dead friends... in the end, only the raccoon survived, a bit like Horatio in Hamlet, so Candy Candy was a tragedy, maybe even more than Barry Lyndon. And I suffered with Candy, you didn't, you mocked her, and I feel that you're nothing less than an insensitive monster.
AA.VV. Barry Lyndon
Voto:
Your speech reminds me less of Kafka and more of that little game from the enigmistic weeklies of the Talking Raven :)
Lynyrd Skynyrd Second Helping
Voto:
(...)
I know a lot of jazz musicians like you, all uptight pricks like you. But how old are you? Do you still follow what you read in biographies? Don’t you have your own ears? ...Ah no, uptight jazz musicians don’t get their own ears; they get a jacket, a tie, and a baton. You are the death of the genre. Name: dotsASSdots | Date: 11/4/2005 | Rating: | Album Rating: So what are you going to do, take Coltrane’s biography and copy some passages into your review of A Love Supreme? How pathetic... the uptight musician... a species thankfully on the verge of extinction. I would have locked you up in a lager and forced you to listen to Avril Lavigne, the Sex Pistols, and Emocore for the rest of your life. Name: dotsASSdots | Date: 11/4/2005 | Rating: | Album Rating:
Ah, I get it, you’re stupid, sorry. Name: raf | Date: 11/4/2005 | Rating: | Album Rating: <---------------------------This exchange is brilliant
Lynyrd Skynyrd Second Helping
Voto:
Your speech makes sense... but there are 96,000 reviews that echo your words, and I didn't feel like repeating them. Then <<<Not by chance, the most fertile periods of the absolute genius Coltrane and the same Davis coincide with periods of non-dependence (at least according to the biographies).>>> Dependency, yes... but it’s not just that drugs mean heroin. I just wanted to approach the discussion from another angle. When they were into heroin, it was calm, relaxed music; here we’re talking about liters of acid, and the music changed. I didn't downplay anything; you're the uptight prick, like all the uptight pricks who ruin the name of Jazz and keep it away from the young. You and those who write the biographies of these legends portray them as supreme beings with a snobbish aura. In reality, they were very skilled; it’s you who's the uptight prick. Name: puntiniCAZpuntini | Date: 11/4/2005 | Rating: | Rating for the Album: (...)
Lynyrd Skynyrd Second Helping
Voto:
BUAHAHAHAH... what a laugh, I had missed this raf... the gem is the discussion about Davis's rece! Well, yes, you're right, even if raf has too controlled a level of absorbing your insults, he almost seems like an automaton; I might prefer Massimof, who goes back and forth more. However, I notice from the number of posts you wrote and those written by raf that he intrigued you more... I don't know, for now 50-50.