Eneathedevil

DeRank : 18,21
DeAge™ : 7756 days • Here since 18 march 2005
CCCP - Fedeli alla linea 1964-1985. Affinità-divergenze fra il compagno Togliatti e noi...
Voto:
Ajeje, no, I actually want it from you and I'm not rereading your posts :) Anyway, I've read just enough and what was necessary: I repeat, your and Bogus's remarks are fine by me; I'm simply making a naive evaluation on a cover that references a particular terminology. The fact that this cover betrays quite different opinions and considerations is clear, I believe, but as I said, it's a matter of "association" with the work.
CCCP - Fedeli alla linea 1964-1985. Affinità-divergenze fra il compagno Togliatti e noi...
Voto:
Oh, damn, yes, I often agree, it’s a terrible thing :D
CCCP - Fedeli alla linea 1964-1985. Affinità-divergenze fra il compagno Togliatti e noi...
Voto:
Perfect, Bogus, you're right. But that's a second reading. So, De Gregori was mentioned, and I'll make use of it. I like De Gregori (up until '85, that is). "But how come, Enea, you idiot, first you talk about communism over here, politicization over there, and then you feel like the most wrecked of communists who made things like 'Pablo' and 'Le Storie di Ieri'?" Well, the De Gregori of the '70s and '80s, on a first reading, is a storyteller, an interpreter, a juggler; on a second, he’s a man talking about '68, the infamous American lobbies, left-wing progressivism... pieces like 'Pablo' and 'Le Storie di Ieri' unfold on multiple levels and, at first listen, they seem reassuring, lacking consistent political references, and avoiding graphics pertaining to communist terminology. For the CCCP, it’s the opposite regarding first and second reading. What can I do, the first one annoys me :) Raise your hand if any of you knew that "Il signor Hood" by De Gregori is Marco Pannella!
CCCP - Fedeli alla linea 1964-1985. Affinità-divergenze fra il compagno Togliatti e noi...
Voto:
Yes, Bogus, but when you take a second visual examination, at first you only read "CCCP" in parallelepiped letters :)
CCCP - Fedeli alla linea 1964-1985. Affinità-divergenze fra il compagno Togliatti e noi...
Voto:
But Bogus, I mean, are you an insurrectionist communist? Disgustiiiiiing! :)) Yes, yes, good job Kosmo, perfect analysis that I can totally relate to.
CCCP - Fedeli alla linea 1964-1985. Affinità-divergenze fra il compagno Togliatti e noi...
Voto:
Eh, ajeje, I know you're a novice who doesn't like serious texts. You like Righeira and Scialpi, admit it, that's who Ringo was referring to in the review!
CCCP - Fedeli alla linea 1964-1985. Affinità-divergenze fra il compagno Togliatti e noi...
Voto:
I understand, this symbolism does not do us good, and we are aware of that. However, it is also true that the cliché of blaming the Church is becoming more trivial than the opposite, given that we continue to be attacked now that we no longer dream of resorting to what can only be defined as "Medieval stuff"; by now, everything is very formal, Christian symbolism is sparse, and the persuasive power is, in our opinion, limited. A discussion should be opened rather about religions, regarding the reference of ajejebrazorf also to Muslim civilization, as the symbolism in those other cases is even more pronounced, and the persuasive power often becomes executive power, let alone Christianity.
Blondie Parallel Lines
Voto:
Uh, I don’t like free jazz... but I’ll look into it :)
CCCP - Fedeli alla linea 1964-1985. Affinità-divergenze fra il compagno Togliatti e noi...
Voto:
Well, I wasn't there yesterday and the day before, then I saw how the discussion evolved, so civilly, and I posted. And anyway, as you can see, I don't agree :)