El Guevo

In my opinion, you are making a big confusion. Your last comment about obladi oblada also proves it. Anyway, if you're happy...

rocknrollsuicide it’s not important who came first, but if you really want to play this game you should educate yourself more and listen better. Maybe you’ve confused psychedelia with something else since you mention a band like the Velvet Underground, which is as far removed from psychedelia as it can get. You forget about the records that Lewis reminded you of, and not only that, have you ever heard of the 13th Floor Elevators? And if you think psychedelia is a genre like that of the Doors, then you really need to go back to school.

One of the most beautiful pages on debaser

mind your own business

Evidently, I was misunderstood because I certainly didn't mean to make the usual comparison between the Beatles and the Rolling Stones. Frankly, it seems absurd to me to diminish the importance and beauty of albums like Sgt. Peppers or Beggars Banquet, just as the usual donjunio did, who after making grand statements about The Queen Is Dead, here with two posts throws his musical reputation away. To each their own, of course. I also like some songs from this album, but all in all, I share Keith's opinion and I don't believe he is as dim-witted as the review suggests. Perhaps I was too harsh in my first post, also because aside from the ending, the review isn't bad; it just might be too exaggerated in its praise for the product (but this is something forgivable, justified by the love the reviewer has for the album). However, it forgets to mention one very important thing: that the album in question was not born from the artistic needs of Jagger-Richards, but rather from the record label's desire to ride the psychedelic wave with the rolling stones as well. The result was a bit of a misstep. Fortunately, after that, there was Beggars' Banquet!

An album dedicated to his current muse that has very little to do with the youthful rebellion of those years, especially since many of these songs (90% of the album) are older, like "intoxicated man" or "la javanaise," to give two significant examples. Just as the album from the same year is more significant: "Initials B.B." even if anything recorded by Gainsbourg deserves top marks. The central part of the review is good, but I don’t understand either the beginning or the end; in fact, I don't agree with them.

Surely the least beautiful of the Stones from the 60s. Then again, tastes are tastes, but objectively this is an album made just because that psychedelic genre was in fashion, which the Stones absolutely cannot do, unlike the Beatles. It’s a crime to compare it to the legendary Beggars Banquet and the other masterpieces that followed, but even those they made before this one are much better. This album is a rather uninspired episode... and I'm certainly not insensitive when it comes to musical taste and changes.

One cannot talk about this soundtrack without mentioning Carlos.

No, we are not on the same page.

Nice review! I haven't had the pleasure of listening to the album yet.